Answer:
The heat loss rate through one of the windows made of polycarbonate is 252W. If the window is made of aerogel, the heat loss rate is 16.8W. If the window is made of soda-lime glass, the heat loss rate is 1190.4W.
The cost associated with the heat loss through the windows for an 8-hour flight is:
For aerogel windows: $17.472 (most efficient)
For polycarbonate windows: $262.08
For soda-lime glass windows: $1,238.016 (least efficient)
Explanation:
To calculate the heat loss rate through the window, we can use a model of heat transmission by conduction throw flat wall. Using unidimensional Fourier law:

In this case:

If we replace the data provided by the problem we get the heat loss rate through one of the windows of each material (we only have to change the thermal conductivities).
To obtain the thermal conductivity of the soda-lime glass we use the graphic attached to this answer (In this case for soda-lime glass k₃₀₀=0.992w/m·K).
To calculate the cost associated with the heat loss through the windows for an 8-hour flight we use this formula (using the heat loss rate calculated in each case):

Answer:
45.3 MN
Explanation:
The forging force at the end of the stroke is given by
F = Y.π.r².[1 + (2μr/3h)]
The final height, h is given as h = 100/2
h = 50 mm
Next, we find the final radius by applying the volume constancy law
volumes before deformation = volumes after deformation
π * 75² * 2 * 100 = π * r² * 2 * 50
75² * 2 = r²
r² = 11250
r = √11250
r = 106 mm
E = In(100/50)
E = 0.69
From the graph flow, we find that Y = 1000 MPa, and thus, we apply the formula
F = Y.π.r².[1 + (2μr/3h)]
F = 1000 * 3.142 * 0.106² * [1 + (2 * 0.2 * 0.106/ 3 * 0.05)]
F = 35.3 * [1 + 0.2826]
F = 35.3 * 1.2826
F = 45.3 MN
Answer:

Explanation:
The position of each point are the following:

Since the three objects report charges with same sign, then, net force has a repulsive nature. The net force experimented by point charge A is:




