(a)
Electronic configuration is given as follows:
![[Kr]4d^{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BKr%5D4d%5E%7B3%7D)
Since, this is the electronic configuration of ion with+3 that means 3 electrons are removed. On adding the 3 electrons, the electronic configuration of neutral atom can be obtained.
Thus, electronic configuration of neutral atom is ![[Kr]4d^{5}5s^{1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BKr%5D4d%5E%7B5%7D5s%5E%7B1%7D)
.
The atomic number of Kr is 36, thus, total number of electrons become 36+6=42.
This corresponds to element: molybdenum. Thus, the tripositive atom will be 
.
(b) The given electronic configuration is ![[Kr]5s^{2}4d^{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BKr%5D5s%5E%7B2%7D4d%5E%7B2%7D)
.
The atomic number of Kr is 36, thus, total number of electrons become 36+4=40.
This corresponds to element zirconium, represented by symbol Zr.
It's either 3 or 4 I know this becuase I have read a book about electricity
Answer:
They are both correct.
Explanation:
The density of an object is defined as the ratio of its mass to its volume. This implies that the density of the object is both proportional to the mass and also to the volume of the object. John only mentioned mass which is correct. Linda mentioned the second variable on which density depends which is the volume of the object.
Hence considering the both statements objectively, one can say that they are both correct.
They can either cancel each other or add up to a resultant force with a certain direction and modulus.
Newton's second law states that F=m*a, where F is the resultant force, ie ΣF.
