Ask question

Ask question

All categories

goldfiish [28.3K]

3 years ago

11

Technician A says that some vehicle makers do NOT apply undercoating to the floor pan. Technician B says that some vehicle maker

s do NOT apply anti-corrosion compound to interior cavities. Who is right?

1 answer:

Mama L [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Both technicians are right

You might be interested in

A developer has requested permission to build a large retail store at a location adjacent to the intersection of an undivided fo

Sergio [31]

Answer:

676 ft

Explanation:

Minimum sight distance, d_min

d_min = 1.47 * v_max * t_total where v_max is maximum velocity in mi/h, t_total is total time

v_max is given as 50 mi/h

t_total is sum of time for right-turn and adjustment time=8.5+0.7=9.2 seconds

Substituting these figures we obtain d_min=1.47*50*9.2=676.2 ft

For practical purposes, this distance is taken as 676 ft

6 0

3 years ago

Write code (ReverseNames.java) that prompts the user to enter his or her full name, then prints the name in reverse order (i.e.,

yan [13]

Answer:

import java.util.Scanner;

import java.io.*;

public class Main{

public static void main(String []args){

StringBuilder reversedName = new StringBuilder();

StringBuilder subName = new StringBuilder();

Scanner myObj = new Scanner(System.in); // Create a Scanner object

System.out.println("Enter your full name (last name + first name)");

String name = myObj.nextLine(); // Read user input

for (int i = 0; i < name.length(); i++) {

char currentChar = name.charAt(i);

if (currentChar != ' ') {

subName.append(currentChar);

} else {

reversedName.insert(0, currentChar + subName.toString());

subName.setLength(0);

}

}

String Resul = reversedName.insert(0, subName.toString()).toString();

System.out.println("Reverse full name: " + Resul);

}

}

Explanation:

To solve the problem we used StringBuilder, that allow us to build a string letter by letter, we are using two, one to store temporary information (subName) and the other to store the surname plus name (reversedName). After defining the variables, the program asks for the user fullname using Scanner class and it's method .nextLine (the variable 'name' will save the user input). A while loop is also used to iterate over the name, taking character by character with the method .charAt, the program will append letters in subName until it finds a space only then the content of subName will be transfer to reversedName and the content of subName will be deleted, then the program continues with the process until the end of the for loop; finally, the program places the content of subName at the beginning of reversedName, and print the result transforming the StringBuilder to a normal string.

5 0

3 years ago

Three tool materials (high-speed steel, cemented carbide, and ceramic) are to be compared for the same turning operation on a ba

Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Among all three tools, the ceramic tool is taking the least time for the production of a batch, however, machining from the HSS tool is taking the highest time.

Explanation:

The optimum cutting speed for the minimum cost

$V_{opt}= \frac{C}{\left[\left(T_c+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]^n}\;\cdots(i)$

Where,

C,n = Taylor equation parameters

$T_h$ =Tool changing time in minutes

$C_e$ =Cost per grinding per edge

$C_m$ = Machine and operator cost per minute

On comparing with the Taylor equation $VT^n=C$ ,

Tool life,

$T= \left[ \left(T_t+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]}\;\cdots(ii)$

Given that,

Cost of operator and machine time $=\$40/hr=\$0.667/min$

Batch setting time = 2 hr

Part handling time: $T_h=2.5$ min

Part diameter: $D=73 mm$ $=73\times 10^{-3} m$

Part length: $l=250 mm=250\times 10^{-3} m$

Feed: $f=0.30 mm/rev= 0.3\times 10^{-3} m/rev$

Depth of cut: $d=3.5 mm$

For the HSS tool:

Tool cost is $20 and it can be ground and reground 15 times and the grinding= $2/grind.

So, $C_e=$ $\$20/15+2=\$3.33/edge$

Tool changing time, $T_t=3$ min.

$C= 80 m/min$

$n=0.130$

(a) From equation (i), cutting speed for the minimum cost:

$V_{opt}= \frac {80}{\left[ \left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]^{0.13}}$

$\Rightarrow 47.7$ m/min

(b) From equation (ii), the tool life,

$T=\left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]}$

$\Rightarrow T=53.4$ min

(c) Cycle time: $T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

where,

$T_m=$ Machining time for one part

$n_p=$ Number of pieces cut in one tool life

$T_m= \frac{l}{fN}$ min, where $N=\frac{V_{opt}}{\pi D}$ is the rpm of the spindle.

$\Rightarrow T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 47.7}=4.01 min/pc$

So, the number of parts produced in one tool life

$n_p=\frac {T}{T_m}$

$\Rightarrow n_p=\frac {53.4}{4.01}=13.3$

Round it to the lower integer

$\Rightarrow n_p=13$

So, the cycle time

$T_c=2.5+4.01+\frac{3}{13}=6.74$ min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times6.74+\frac{3.33}{13}=\$4.75/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch= Sum of setup time and production time for one batch

$=2\times60+ {50\times 6.74}{50}=457 min=7.62 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times4.01}{457}=0.4387=43.87\%$

Now, for the cemented carbide tool:

Cost per edge,

$C_e=$ $\$8/6=\$1.33/edge$

Tool changing time, $T_t=1min$

$C= 650 m/min$

$n=0.30$

(a) Cutting speed for the minimum cost:

$V_{opt}= \frac {650}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]^{0.3}}=363m/min$ [from(i)]

(b) Tool life,

$T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]=7min$ [from(ii)]

(c) Cycle time:

$T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

$T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 363}=0.53min/pc$

$n_p=\frac {7}{0.53}=13.2$

$\Rightarrow n_p=13$ [ nearest lower integer]

So, the cycle time

$T_c=2.5+0.53+\frac{1}{13}=3.11 min/pc$

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times3.11+\frac{1.33}{13}=\$2.18/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch $=2\times60+ {50\times 3.11}{50}=275.5 min=4.59 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times0.53}{275.5}=0.0962=9.62\%$

Similarly, for the ceramic tool:

$C_e=$ $\$10/6=\$1.67/edge$

$T_t-1min$

$C= 3500 m/min$

$n=0.6$

(a) Cutting speed:

$V_{opt}= \frac {3500}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]^{0.6}}$

$\Rightarrow V_{opt}=2105 m/min$

(b) Tool life,

$T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]=2.33 min$

(c) Cycle time:

$T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 2105}=0.091 min/pc$

$n_p=\frac {2.33}{0.091}=25.6$

$\Rightarrow n_p=25 pc/tool\; life$

So,

$T_c=2.5+0.091+\frac{1}{25}=2.63 min/pc$

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times2.63+\frac{1.67}{25}=$1.82/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch

$=2\times60+ {50\times 2.63}=251.5 min=4.19 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times0.091}{251.5}=0.0181=1.81\%$

3 0

4 years ago

A vehicle of 1 200 kg is moving at a speed of 40 km/h on an incline of 1 in 50. The total constant rolling and wind resistance i

Readme [11.4K]

Answer:11.602 KW

Explanation:

mass of vehicle $\left ( m\right )=1200 kg$

speed=40Km/h

Resistance=600 N

$\eta =80%$

Gear ratio $\left ( G\right )=4:1$

$D_{effective}=500mm$

Net force to overcome by engine is

F=Resistance + sin component of weight

F=600+ $mgsin\theta$

Where $tan\theta =[tex]\frac{1}{50}$

$\theta =1.1457^{\circ}$

$F=600+1200\times 9.81\times sin\left ( 1.1457\right )$

F=600+235.38=835.38 N

power= $F.v=835.38\frac{100}{9}$

Engine Power= $\frac{835.\frac{100}{9}}{\eta }$ =11.602 KW

4 0

4 years ago

In details and step-by-step, show how you apply the Bubble Sort algorithm on the following list of values. Your answer should sh

astraxan [27]

( 12 17 18 19 25 )

<u>Explanation:</u>

<u>First Pass:</u>

( 19 18 25 17 12 ) –> ( 18 19 25 17 12 ), Here, algorithm compares the first two elements, and swaps since 19 > 18.

( 18 19 25 17 12 ) –> ( 18 19 25 17 12 ), Now, since these elements are already in order (25 > 19), algorithm does not swap them.

( 18 19 25 17 12 ) –> ( 18 19 17 25 12 ), Swap since 25 > 17

( 18 19 17 25 12 ) –> ( 18 19 17 12 25 ), Swap since 25 > 12

<u>Second Pass:</u>

( 18 19 17 12 25 ) –> ( 18 19 17 12 25 )

( 18 19 17 12 25 ) –> ( 18 17 19 12 25 ), Swap since 19 > 17

( 18 17 19 12 25 ) –> ( 18 17 12 19 25 ), Swap since 19 > 12

( 18 17 12 19 25 ) –> ( 18 17 12 19 25 )

<u>Third Pass:</u>

( 18 17 12 19 25 ) –> ( 17 18 12 19 25 ), Swap since 18 > 17

( 17 18 12 19 25 ) –> ( 17 12 18 19 25 ), Swap since 18 > 12

( 17 12 18 19 25 ) –> ( 17 12 18 19 25 )

( 17 12 18 19 25 ) –> ( 17 12 18 19 25 )

<u>Fourth Pass:</u>

( 17 12 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 ), Swap since 17 > 12

( 12 17 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 ), Swap since 18 > 12

( 12 17 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 )

( 12 17 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 )

Now, the array is already sorted, but our algorithm does not know if it is completed. The algorithm needs one whole pass without any swap to know it is sorted.

<u>Fifth Pass:</u>

( 12 17 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 )

( 12 17 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 )

( 12 17 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 )

( 12 17 18 19 25 ) –> ( 12 17 18 19 25 )

6 0

3 years ago