1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rodikova [14]
3 years ago
10

Three tool materials (high-speed steel, cemented carbide, and ceramic) are to be compared for the same turning operation on a ba

tch of 50 steel parts. For the high-speed steel tool, the Taylor equation parameters are n = 0.130 and C = 80 (m/min). The price of the HSS tool is $20.00, and it is estimated that it can be ground and reground 15 times at a cost of $2.00 per grind. Tool change time is 3 min. Both carbide and ceramic tools are inserts and can be held in the same mechanical toolholder. The Taylor equation parameters for the cemented carbide are n = 0.30 and C = 650 (m/min), and for the ceramic: n = 0.6 and C = 3500 (m/min). The cost per insert for the carbide is $8.00, and for the ceramic is $10.00. There are six cutting edges per insert in both cases. Tool change time = 1.0 min for both tools. The time to change a part = 2.5 min. Feed = 0.30 mm/rev, and depth of cut = 3.5 mm. Cost of operator and machine time = $40/hr. Part diameter = 73 mm, and length = 250 mm. Setup time for the batch = 2.0 hr. For the three tooling cases, compare (a) cutting speeds for minimum cost, (b) tool lives, (c) cycle time, (d) cost per production unit, and (e) total time to complete the batch. (f) What is the proportion of time spent actually cutting metal for each tool material?
Engineering
1 answer:
Tpy6a [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Among all three tools, the ceramic tool is taking the least time for the production of a batch, however, machining from the HSS tool is taking the highest time.

Explanation:

The optimum cutting speed for the minimum cost

V_{opt}= \frac{C}{\left[\left(T_c+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]^n}\;\cdots(i)

Where,

C,n = Taylor equation parameters

T_h =Tool changing time in minutes

C_e=Cost per grinding per edge

C_m= Machine and operator cost per minute

On comparing with the Taylor equation VT^n=C,

Tool life,

T= \left[ \left(T_t+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]}\;\cdots(ii)

Given that,  

Cost of operator and machine time=\$40/hr=\$0.667/min

Batch setting time = 2 hr

Part handling time: T_h=2.5 min

Part diameter: D=73 mm =73\times 10^{-3} m

Part length: l=250 mm=250\times 10^{-3} m

Feed: f=0.30 mm/rev= 0.3\times 10^{-3} m/rev

Depth of cut: d=3.5 mm

For the HSS tool:

Tool cost is $20 and it can be ground and reground 15 times and the grinding= $2/grind.

So, C_e= \$20/15+2=\$3.33/edge

Tool changing time, T_t=3 min.

C= 80 m/min

n=0.130

(a) From equation (i), cutting speed for the minimum cost:

V_{opt}= \frac {80}{\left[ \left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]^{0.13}}

\Rightarrow 47.7 m/min

(b) From equation (ii), the tool life,

T=\left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]}

\Rightarrow T=53.4 min

(c) Cycle time: T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

where,

T_m= Machining time for one part

n_p= Number of pieces cut in one tool life

T_m= \frac{l}{fN} min, where N=\frac{V_{opt}}{\pi D} is the rpm of the spindle.

\Rightarrow T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 47.7}=4.01 min/pc

So, the number of parts produced in one tool life

n_p=\frac {T}{T_m}

\Rightarrow n_p=\frac {53.4}{4.01}=13.3

Round it to the lower integer

\Rightarrow n_p=13

So, the cycle time

T_c=2.5+4.01+\frac{3}{13}=6.74 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times6.74+\frac{3.33}{13}=\$4.75/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch= Sum of setup time and production time for one batch

=2\times60+ {50\times 6.74}{50}=457 min=7.62 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times4.01}{457}=0.4387=43.87\%

Now, for the cemented carbide tool:

Cost per edge,

C_e= \$8/6=\$1.33/edge

Tool changing time, T_t=1min

C= 650 m/min

n=0.30

(a) Cutting speed for the minimum cost:

V_{opt}= \frac {650}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]^{0.3}}=363m/min [from(i)]

(b) Tool life,

T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]=7min [from(ii)]

(c) Cycle time:

T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 363}=0.53min/pc

n_p=\frac {7}{0.53}=13.2

\Rightarrow n_p=13 [ nearest lower integer]

So, the cycle time

T_c=2.5+0.53+\frac{1}{13}=3.11 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times3.11+\frac{1.33}{13}=\$2.18/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch=2\times60+ {50\times 3.11}{50}=275.5 min=4.59 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times0.53}{275.5}=0.0962=9.62\%

Similarly, for the ceramic tool:

C_e= \$10/6=\$1.67/edge

T_t-1min

C= 3500 m/min

n=0.6

(a) Cutting speed:

V_{opt}= \frac {3500}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]^{0.6}}

\Rightarrow V_{opt}=2105 m/min

(b) Tool life,

T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]=2.33 min

(c) Cycle time:

T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 2105}=0.091 min/pc

n_p=\frac {2.33}{0.091}=25.6

\Rightarrow n_p=25 pc/tool\; life

So,

T_c=2.5+0.091+\frac{1}{25}=2.63 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times2.63+\frac{1.67}{25}=$1.82/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch

=2\times60+ {50\times 2.63}=251.5 min=4.19 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times0.091}{251.5}=0.0181=1.81\%

You might be interested in
For some transformation having kinetics that obey the Avrami equation, the parameter n is known to have a value of 2. If, after
kotegsom [21]

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

For some transformation having kinetics that obey the Avrami equation, the parameter n is known to have a value of 2. If, after 100 s, the reaction is 40% complete, how long (total time in seconds) will it take the transformation to go to 95% completion

y = 1 - exp( -ktⁿ )

Answer: the time required for 95% transformation is 242.17 s

Explanation:

First, we calculate the value of k which is the dependent variable in Avrami equation

y = 1 - exp( -ktⁿ )

exp( -ktⁿ ) = 1 - y

-ktⁿ = In( 1 - y )

k = - In( 1 - y ) / tⁿ

now given that; n = 2, y = 40% = 0.40, and t = 100 s

we substitute

k = - In( 1 - 0.40 ) / 100²

k = - In(0.60) / 10000

k = 0.5108 / 10000

k = 0.00005108 ≈ 5.108 × 10⁻⁵

Now calculate the time required for 95% transformation

tⁿ = - In( 1 - y ) / k

t = [- In( 1 - y ) / k ]^1/n

n = 2, y = 95% = 0.95 and k = 5.108 × 10⁻⁵

we substitute our values

t = [- In( 1 - 0.95 ) / 5.108 × 10⁻⁵ ]^1/2

t = [2.9957 / 5.108 × 10⁻⁵]^1/2

t = [ 58647.22 ]^1/2

t = 242.17 s

Therefore the time required for 95% transformation is 242.17 s

8 0
3 years ago
‼️Will mark brainliest‼️
Slav-nsk [51]
YAll don’t tell my cousin I’m hacking her school resources because I got a 0 in a test and she got a 100

4 0
3 years ago
Briefly discuss if it would be better to operate with pumps in parallel or series and how your answer would change as the steepn
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

1) In series, the combined head will move from point 1 to point 2 in theory. However, practically speaking, the combined head and flow rate will move along the system curve to point 3.

2) In parallel, the combined head and volume flow will move along the system curve from point 1 to point 3.

Explanation:

1) Pump in series:

When two or more pumps are connected in series, their resulting pump performance curve will be obtained by adding their respective heads at the same flow rate as shown in the first diagram attached.

In the first diagram, we have 3 curves namely:

- system curve

- single pump curve

- 2 pump in series curve

Also, we have points labeled 1, 2 and 3.

- Point 1 represents the point that the system operates with one pump running.

- Point 2 represents the point where the head of two identical pumps connected in series is twice the head of a single pump flowing at the same rate.

- Point 3 is the point where the system is operating when both pumps are running.

Now, since the flowrate is constant, the combined head will move from point 1 to point 2 in theory. However, practically speaking, the combined head and flow rate will move along the system curve to point 3.

2) Pump in parallel:

When two or more pumps are connected in parallel, their resulting pump performance curve will be obtained by adding their respective flow rates at same head as shown in the second diagram attached.

In the second diagram, we have 3 curves namely:

- system curve

- single pump curve

- 2 pump in series curve

Also, we have points labeled 1, 2 and 3

- Point 1 represents the point that the system operates with one pump running.

- Point 2 represents the point where the flow rate of two identical pumps connected in series is twice the flow rate of a single pump.

- Point 3 is the point where the system is operating when both pumps are running.

In this case, the combined head and volume flow will move along the system curve from point 1 to point 3.

5 0
2 years ago
Discuss typical advantages and disadvantages of an irrigation system?
trapecia [35]
Advantages include low costs and minimal labor.Water stays in the root zone, and foliage stays dry. Drawbacks to surface irrigation include potential overwatering and wasteful runoff.
4 0
3 years ago
1: A baseball is hit 4 feet above the ground leaves the bat with an initial speed of 98 ft/sec at an angle of 0 45 is caught by
zvonat [6]

Answer:

299.36 feet

Explanation:

To \ find  \   the  \ distance \  of  \ the  \ ball \  from  \ the \ home  \ plate.  \\ \\ From  \ the  \ given  \ information:

Height \ h = 4 \ ft

Initial \ speed \ V_o = 98 \ ft/s ec

The  \ angle \  \theta = 45^0

Acceleration \ due \ to \ gravity (g)= 32.2 \ ft/s

U_x = V_o \ cos 45 = \dfrac{98}{\sqrt{2}}

U_y = V_o \ sin 45 = \dfrac{98}{\sqrt{2}}

So;

S_y = u_y t - \dfrac{1}{2}gt^2

-1 =\dfrac{98}{\sqrt{2}}t - \dfrac{1}{2}*32*1.85t^2

By solving:

t_1 = 4.32 \ sec

Thus;

horizontal \ distance = U_x t

= \dfrac{98}{\sqrt{2}}\times 4.32

\mathbf{=299.36  \ feet}

\mathbf{Thus \ , the  \  distance \ from \  the  \ home  \ plate \  =  \ 299.36  \ feet}

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A mysterious device found in a forgotten laboratory accumulates charge at a rate specified by the expression gm = 9 - 10tC from
    13·1 answer
  • Choose the best data type for each of the following so that any reasonable value is accommodated but no memory storage is wasted
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Under what conditions can soils be chemically stabilized?
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the measurement shown in figure 7 and state in centimeters ​
    5·1 answer
  • Write a program that uses while loops to perform the following steps: Step a: Prompt the user to input two integers: firstNum an
    12·1 answer
  • Before accurate distance standards, a cubit was the length of whose forearm?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the relationship between atomic structure and Youngs' modulus?
    15·1 answer
  • A minor road intersects a major 4-lane divided road with a design speed of 50 mph and a median width of 12 ft. The intersection
    13·1 answer
  • What are the laws that apply to one vehicle towing another?
    11·1 answer
  • Phosphorus and nitrogen are included in which category of water pollutants?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!