1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rodikova [14]
3 years ago
10

Three tool materials (high-speed steel, cemented carbide, and ceramic) are to be compared for the same turning operation on a ba

tch of 50 steel parts. For the high-speed steel tool, the Taylor equation parameters are n = 0.130 and C = 80 (m/min). The price of the HSS tool is $20.00, and it is estimated that it can be ground and reground 15 times at a cost of $2.00 per grind. Tool change time is 3 min. Both carbide and ceramic tools are inserts and can be held in the same mechanical toolholder. The Taylor equation parameters for the cemented carbide are n = 0.30 and C = 650 (m/min), and for the ceramic: n = 0.6 and C = 3500 (m/min). The cost per insert for the carbide is $8.00, and for the ceramic is $10.00. There are six cutting edges per insert in both cases. Tool change time = 1.0 min for both tools. The time to change a part = 2.5 min. Feed = 0.30 mm/rev, and depth of cut = 3.5 mm. Cost of operator and machine time = $40/hr. Part diameter = 73 mm, and length = 250 mm. Setup time for the batch = 2.0 hr. For the three tooling cases, compare (a) cutting speeds for minimum cost, (b) tool lives, (c) cycle time, (d) cost per production unit, and (e) total time to complete the batch. (f) What is the proportion of time spent actually cutting metal for each tool material?
Engineering
1 answer:
Tpy6a [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Among all three tools, the ceramic tool is taking the least time for the production of a batch, however, machining from the HSS tool is taking the highest time.

Explanation:

The optimum cutting speed for the minimum cost

V_{opt}= \frac{C}{\left[\left(T_c+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]^n}\;\cdots(i)

Where,

C,n = Taylor equation parameters

T_h =Tool changing time in minutes

C_e=Cost per grinding per edge

C_m= Machine and operator cost per minute

On comparing with the Taylor equation VT^n=C,

Tool life,

T= \left[ \left(T_t+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]}\;\cdots(ii)

Given that,  

Cost of operator and machine time=\$40/hr=\$0.667/min

Batch setting time = 2 hr

Part handling time: T_h=2.5 min

Part diameter: D=73 mm =73\times 10^{-3} m

Part length: l=250 mm=250\times 10^{-3} m

Feed: f=0.30 mm/rev= 0.3\times 10^{-3} m/rev

Depth of cut: d=3.5 mm

For the HSS tool:

Tool cost is $20 and it can be ground and reground 15 times and the grinding= $2/grind.

So, C_e= \$20/15+2=\$3.33/edge

Tool changing time, T_t=3 min.

C= 80 m/min

n=0.130

(a) From equation (i), cutting speed for the minimum cost:

V_{opt}= \frac {80}{\left[ \left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]^{0.13}}

\Rightarrow 47.7 m/min

(b) From equation (ii), the tool life,

T=\left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]}

\Rightarrow T=53.4 min

(c) Cycle time: T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

where,

T_m= Machining time for one part

n_p= Number of pieces cut in one tool life

T_m= \frac{l}{fN} min, where N=\frac{V_{opt}}{\pi D} is the rpm of the spindle.

\Rightarrow T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 47.7}=4.01 min/pc

So, the number of parts produced in one tool life

n_p=\frac {T}{T_m}

\Rightarrow n_p=\frac {53.4}{4.01}=13.3

Round it to the lower integer

\Rightarrow n_p=13

So, the cycle time

T_c=2.5+4.01+\frac{3}{13}=6.74 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times6.74+\frac{3.33}{13}=\$4.75/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch= Sum of setup time and production time for one batch

=2\times60+ {50\times 6.74}{50}=457 min=7.62 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times4.01}{457}=0.4387=43.87\%

Now, for the cemented carbide tool:

Cost per edge,

C_e= \$8/6=\$1.33/edge

Tool changing time, T_t=1min

C= 650 m/min

n=0.30

(a) Cutting speed for the minimum cost:

V_{opt}= \frac {650}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]^{0.3}}=363m/min [from(i)]

(b) Tool life,

T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]=7min [from(ii)]

(c) Cycle time:

T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 363}=0.53min/pc

n_p=\frac {7}{0.53}=13.2

\Rightarrow n_p=13 [ nearest lower integer]

So, the cycle time

T_c=2.5+0.53+\frac{1}{13}=3.11 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times3.11+\frac{1.33}{13}=\$2.18/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch=2\times60+ {50\times 3.11}{50}=275.5 min=4.59 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times0.53}{275.5}=0.0962=9.62\%

Similarly, for the ceramic tool:

C_e= \$10/6=\$1.67/edge

T_t-1min

C= 3500 m/min

n=0.6

(a) Cutting speed:

V_{opt}= \frac {3500}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]^{0.6}}

\Rightarrow V_{opt}=2105 m/min

(b) Tool life,

T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]=2.33 min

(c) Cycle time:

T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 2105}=0.091 min/pc

n_p=\frac {2.33}{0.091}=25.6

\Rightarrow n_p=25 pc/tool\; life

So,

T_c=2.5+0.091+\frac{1}{25}=2.63 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times2.63+\frac{1.67}{25}=$1.82/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch

=2\times60+ {50\times 2.63}=251.5 min=4.19 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times0.091}{251.5}=0.0181=1.81\%

You might be interested in
To understand the concept of moment of a force and how to calculate it using a scalar formulation.
AysviL [449]

Answer:

When analyzing forces in a structure or machine, it is conventional to classify forces as external forces;

constraint forces or internal forces.

External forces arise from interaction between the system of interest and its surroundings.

Examples of external forces include gravitational forces; lift or drag forces arising from wind loading;

electrostatic and electromagnetic forces; and buoyancy forces; among others. Force laws governing these

effects are listed later in this section.

Constraint forces are exerted by one part of a structure on another, through joints, connections or contacts

between components. Constraint forces are very complex, and will be discussed in detail in Section 8.

Internal forces are forces that act inside a solid part of a structure or component. For example, a stretched

rope has a tension force acting inside it, holding the rope together. Most solid objects contain very

complex distributions of internal force. These internal forces ultimately lead to structural failure, and also

cause the structure to deform. The purpose of calculating forces in a structure or component is usually to

deduce the internal forces, so as to be able to design stiff, lightweight and strong components. We will

not, unfortunately, be able to develop a full theory of internal forces in this course – a proper discussion

requires understanding of partial differential equations, as well as vector and tensor calculus. However, a

brief discussion of internal forces in slender members will be provided in Section 9.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What is one major life lesson you learned from the movie; ¨Spare Parts¨
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

darts,” a smart, creative and highly-enjoyable drama about a team of intelligent, hard-working and ambitious high school students who enter a prestigious robotics competition, and their dedicated science teacher who mentors, educates, pushes and inspires them, is a rousing, uplifting, spirited–and excellent–film and a great start to the new film

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explicar el funcionamiento de un multímetro analógico.
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

Un multímetro analógico funciona como un medidor de bobina móvil de imán permanente (PMMC) para tomar mediciones eléctricas

Explanation:

El multímetro analógico es un medidor o galvanómetro D'Arsonval que funciona según el principio de los medidores de bobina móvil de imán permanente (PMMC)

Un multímetro analógico está formado por un puntero de aguja unido a una bobina móvil colocada entre el polo norte y sur de un imán permanente dispuesto de tal manera que, cuando una corriente eléctrica fluye a través de la bobina, genera una fuerza de campo magnético que interactúa con el imán fuerza de campo de los imanes permanentes que hace que la bobina se mueva junto con el puntero de la aguja sobre un dial graduado

Para controlar el movimiento del puntero de la aguja, de modo que el par requerido para producir una cantidad de movimiento por corriente detectada por el multímetro, se colocan dos resortes a través de la bobina para proporcionar resistencia al movimiento en ambas direcciones y para permitir la calibración del multímetro analógico.

4 0
3 years ago
Most equipment is cooled by bringing cold air in the front and ducting the heat out of the back. What is the term for where the
vitfil [10]

Answer: Hot aisle

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Technician A says that the use of methanol in internal combustion engines has declined over the years. Technician B says that th
enyata [817]

Answer:

Both Technician A and B are correct

Explanation:

Methanol is used in internal combustion engines. However, the use of methanol in internal combustion engines has decreased lately even though it was thought to lead to cleaner emissions than gasoline. Methanol internal combustion engines produce formaldehyde which is also an environmental pollutant. Also, the cost of methanol is slightly higher than that of good quality gasoline.

MTBE replaced tetraethyllead as a gasoline additive because the former lead to the emission of particulate lead from automobile exhausts which is a serious environmental pollutant. The use of MTBE has declined over the years due to environmental concerns. It has been banned because it has been found to be a significant groundwater pollutant if gasoline containing MTBE is spilled or leaked at gas stations.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Line layout is also called ......​
    5·1 answer
  • why HF (hydrogen fluoride) has higher boiling temperature than HCl (hydrogen chloride), even thought HF has lower molecular weig
    8·1 answer
  • The heat input to an Otto cycle is 1000kJ/kg. The compression ratio is 8 and the pressure and temperature at the beginning of th
    8·1 answer
  • What is the uncertainty in position of an electron of an atom if there is t 2.0 x 10' msec uncertainty in its velocity? Use the
    12·1 answer
  • A Carnot engine is operated between two heat reservoirs at temperatures of 520 K and 300 K. It receives heat from the 520 K rese
    8·1 answer
  • Think about the science you have studied in the past or are currently studying. Give an example of something you have learned in
    11·1 answer
  • Which power transfer system is most suitable for the food processing industry?
    13·1 answer
  • Effective presentations are: Have a central message Colorful and exciting Have many messages Are influence by a setting Created
    15·2 answers
  • How can you contribute to achieved the mission of NSTP during pandemic in your society?
    7·1 answer
  • 7. If you can't ignore a distraction, what should you do?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!