Answer:
The moment of inertia decreased by a factor of 4
Explanation:
Given;
initial angular velocity of the ice skater, ω₁ = 2.5 rev/s
final angular velocity of the ice skater, ω₂ = 10.0 rev/s
During this process we assume that angular momentum is conserved;
I₁ω₁ = I₂ω₂
Where;
I₁ is the initial moment of inertia
I₂ is the final moment of inertia
Therefore, the moment of inertia decreased by a factor of 4
Answer:
1) True, 2) True, 3) False, 4) False, 5) False
Explanation:
1) True. Dissipative energy cannot be recovered, in general it is a form of heat
2) True. The dissipation can be by radiation, heat
3) False. Mechanical energy is divided into K and U but not in equal parts
4) False. When there are dissipative interactions, part of the mechanical energy is set in the form of heat, so its value decreases
5) False. Mechanical energy is the sum of those two energies
The formula v=fλ can be used here.
326=2500*λ
Note the 2500 as 2.5kHz is 2.5 thousand Hz.
λ = 326/2500
= 0.1304m = 0.130m
A hypothesis proposes a mechanism of change that can be tested. If the results indicate the hypothesized mechanism is not the one in operation it narrows the field and we know more. A falsified hypothesis tested by a well designed experiment still provides real evidence about the world.
<span>It was once thought that maggots spontaneously arose from carrion. This was tested and falsified providing evidence this was not how new generations of flies appeared. This still left the question of how flies generated new life to be explored. One falsified hypothesis does not block further research into the question.
</span><span>Even a failed hypothesis can increase scientific knowledge if done correctly. By knowing this hypothesis is not how something works, you save time for future scientists and can now use your effort in other investigations. That is the real value of hypothesis that are not supported by evidence.</span>
