1.Paper Chromatography. This method is often used in the food industry. ...
2.Filtration. This is a more common method of separating an insoluble solid from a liquid. ...
3.Evaporation. ...
4Simple distillation. ...
Fractional distillation.
Answer:
Train accaleration = 0.70 m/s^2
Explanation:
We have a pendulum (presumably simple in nature) in an accelerating train. As the train accelerates, the pendulum is going move in the opposite direction due to inertia. The force which causes this movement has the same accaleration as that of the train. This is the basis for the problem.
Start by setting up a free body diagram of all the forces in play: The gravitational force on the pendulum (mg), the force caused by the pendulum's inertial resistance to the train(F_i), and the resulting force of tension caused by the other two forces (F_r).
Next, set up your sum of forces equations/relationships. Note that the sum of vertical forces (y-direction) balance out and equal 0. While the horizontal forces add up to the total mass of the pendulum times it's accaleration; which, again, equals the train's accaleration.
After doing this, I would isolate the resulting force in the sum of vertical forces, substitute it into the horizontal force equation, and solve for the acceleration. The problem should reduce to show that the acceleration is proportional to the gravity times the tangent of the angle it makes.
I've attached my work, comment with any questions.
Side note: If you take this end result and solve for the angle, you'll see that no matter how fast the train accelerates, the pendulum will never reach a full 90°!
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
altitude of the Plane 
When Airplane is
away
Distance is changing at the rate of 
From diagram we can write as

differentiate above equation w.r.t time

as altitude is not changing therefore 

at 
substitute the value we get 

Friend #1 gets at least 2/5 of a pizza.
Friend #2 gets at least 2/5 .
Friend #3 gets at least 2/5 .
Friend #4 gets at least 2/5 .
Friend #5 gets at least 2/5 .
Friend #6 gets at least 2/5 .
Sum . . . . . . . . . at least 12/5 of a pizza.
Simplify . . . . . . at least 2.4 pizzas.
-- If pizzas can be bought by the half, they should order at least <em>2-1/2 pizzas.</em>
-- If only whole pizzas have to be ordered, then they should order at least <em>3 pizzas.</em>