All categories

3 years ago

Can someone please help me with history.

Physics

1 answer:

tamaranim1 [39]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Yes my name is Axelrod I can help you

You might be interested in

Astronomers have observed a small, massive object at the center of our Milky Way Galaxy. A ring of material orbits this massive

Mkey [24]

Dkdkdkdkdkzkdkcldkdskkds

3 0

3 years ago

Simon puts new batteries in his radio-controlled car and its controller. He activates the controller, which sends a radio signal

Kaylis [27]

Chemical potential energy to kinetic energy

3 0

4 years ago

Explain which would have more kinetic

andrezito [222]

Answer:

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Chapter 38, Problem 001

Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:

a) $\lambda=2.95x10^{-6}m$

b) infrared region

Explanation:

Photon energy is the "energy carried by a single photon. This amount of energy is directly proportional to the photon's electromagnetic frequency and is inversely proportional to the wavelength. If we have higher the photon's frequency then we have higher its energy. Equivalently, with longer the photon's wavelength, we have lower energy".

Part a

Is provide that the smallest amount of energy that is needed to dissociate a molecule of a material on this case 0.42eV. We know that the energy of the photon is equal to:

$E=hf$

Where h is the Planck's Constant. By the other hand the know that $c=f\lambda$ and if we solve for f we have:

$f=\frac{c}{\lambda}$

If we replace the last equation into the E formula we got:

$E=h\frac{c}{\lambda}$

And if we solve for $\lambda$ we got:

$\lambda =\frac{hc}{E}$

Using the value of the constant $h=4.136x10^{-15} eVs$ we have this:

$\lambda=\frac{4.136x10^{15}eVs (3x10^8 \frac{m}{s})}{0.42eV}=2.95x10^{-6}m$

$\lambda=2.95x10^{-6}m$

Part b

If we see the figure attached, with the red arrow, the value for the wavelenght obtained from part a) is on the infrared region, since is in the order of $10^{-6}m$

4 0

3 years ago

I NEED HELP :) ty.............

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

The answer to your question is given below

Explanation:

From the question given above, we can see that the wave with a higher frequency has a shorter wavelength while that with a lower frequency has a longer wavelength. This is so because the frequency and wavelength of a wave has inverse relationship. This can further be explained by using the following formula:

Velocity = wavelength x frequency

Divide both side by wavelength

Frequency = Velocity /wavelength

Keeping the velocity constant, we have:

Frequency ∝ 1 / wavelength

From the above illustration, we can see clearly that the frequency and wavelength are in inverse relationship. This implies that the higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength and the shorter the frequency, the higher the wavelength.

7 0

3 years ago