1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
storchak [24]
3 years ago
12

Wyatt is moving a box with a mass of 37 kg a distance of 37 meters. Wyatt did 360 J of work in 2 minutes when moving the box. Wh

at was his power output? A) 9.72 W B) 3 W C) 180 W D) 323 W
Physics
2 answers:
pentagon [3]3 years ago
7 0
His power output was 3 Watt (360 Joule/120 seconds). The power output can be calculated by dividing the quantity of work by the amount of second needed for the activity and also by multiplying the force amount with the velocity of the activity. The power output usually used for measuring the ability of machine for doing its job.
enot [183]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Power output, P = 3 watts

Explanation:

It is given that,

Work done by Wyatt, W = 360 J

Time taken, t = 2 minutes = 120 s

We need to find the power output. It is given by:

P=\dfrac{W}{t}

Where

W = work done

t = time taken

So, P=\dfrac{360\ J}{120\ s}

P = 3 Watts

So, the power output is 3 to watts. Hence, this is the required solution.

You might be interested in
The picture below shows a wheelbarrow. Using a wheelbarrow can make it easier to lift a heavy object by
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

B IS CORRECT

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Two wires of the same metal having the same cross-
USPshnik [31]
The answer is true

Step by step explanation:
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose you design a new thermometer called the "x" thermometer. on the x scale, the boiling point of water is 130.0 ox and the
Hoochie [10]

You've told us:

-- 130°x  =  212°F

and

-- 10°x  =  32°F

Thank you.  Those are two points on a graph of °x vs °F .  With those, we can figure out the equation of the graph, and easily convert ANY temperature on one scale to the equivalent temperature on the other scale.

-- If our graph is going to have °x on the horizontal axis and °F on the vertical axis, then the two points we know are  (130, 212)  and  (10, 32) .

-- The slope of the line through these two points is

Slope = (32 - 212) / (10 - 130)

Slope = (-180) / (-120)

Slope = 1.5

So far, the equation of the graph is

F = 1.5 x + (F-intercept)

Plug one of the points into this equation.  I'll use the second point  (10, 32) just because the numbers are smaller:

32 = 1.5 (10) + F-intercept

32 = 15 + (F-intercept)

F-intercept = 17

So the equation of the conversion graph is

F = 1.5 x + 17

There you are !  Now you can plug ANY x temperature in there, and the F temperature jumps out at you.

The question is asking what temperature is the same on both scales. This seems tricky, but it's not too bad.  Whatever that temperature is, since it's the same on both scales, you can take the conversion equation, and write the same variable in BOTH places.

We can write [ x = 1.5x + 17 ], solve it for  x, and the solution will be the same temperature in  F  too.

or

We can write [ F = 1.5F + 17 ], solve it for  F, and the solution will be the same temperature in  x  too.

F = 1.5F + 17

Subtract  F  from each side:  0.5F + 17 = 0

Subtract 17 from each side:   0.5F = -17

Multiply each side by 2 :  F = -34

That should be the temperature that's the same number on both scales.

Let's check it out, using our handy-dandy conversion formula (the equation of our graph):

F = 1.5x + 17

Plug in -34 for  x:  

F = 1.5(-34) + 17

F = -51 + 17

<em>F = -34</em>

It works !  -34 on either scale converts to -34 on the other one too. If the temperature ever gets down to -34, and you take both thermometers outside, they'll both read the same number.

<em>yay !</em>

6 0
3 years ago
Please help
Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

Range = 22.61 m

Explanation:

We can use the formula for the Range in flat ground, given by:

Range=v_i^2\frac{sin(2\theta)}{g}

which for our case renders:

Range=15^2\frac{sin(80^o)}{9.8} \approx 22.61\,\,m

4 0
2 years ago
Theorem: there is no smallest positive rational number.theorem: there is no smallest positive rational number. a proof by contra
matrenka [14]

Assume there is a smallest rational integer that has the following form: a/b

Then observe that we can define a/(b+1), which is strictly less than a/b because its divisor is bigger and is rational because it is the product of two numbers. Due to the contradiction created by our original claims that a/b is the smallest rational number that is possible, we might conclude that there is no such thing as the smallest rational number.

There can therefore be no smallest rational number because we may always define a smaller rational number than the one we now possess.

<h3>What is Rational number ?</h3>

Any number that can be expressed as a ratio is considered reasonable. It is therefore possible to represent it as a fraction when the numerator and denominator are both full numbers.

Learn more about Rational number here:

brainly.com/question/12088221

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The pencil rotates about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the figure. which of the labeled points is the point that the axi
    9·2 answers
  • A tectonic plate near Niihau, an island in Hawaii, grows at an average rate of 11 cm/year. If the rate of plate expansion double
    7·2 answers
  • When nuclear fission occurs some mass is lost where does that mass go
    11·2 answers
  • A 480 kg car moving at 14.4 m/s hits from behind another car moving at 13.3 m/s in the same direction. If the second car has a m
    15·1 answer
  • What happens to a star after it goes supernova? Does the remnant of the star form a dwarf star, neutron star, black hole, or som
    8·2 answers
  • How can DNA be used to tell if two species are related?
    6·1 answer
  • Autobus porusza się ze stałą prędkością 54 km/h Oblicz w jakim czasie przebędzie drogę 450 m
    9·1 answer
  • How much tension must a rope withstand if it is used to accelerate a 960 kg car horizontally along a frictionless track at 1.20
    14·2 answers
  • If you break from the speed in part (c) and then start again from rest, how fast will you be able to drive?
    15·1 answer
  • The figure below shows a man in a boat on a lake. The man's mass is 74 kg, and the boat's is 135 kg. The man and boat are initia
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!