H20* SOO N34 Thats my answer
It is a scientific hypothesis. A scientific hypothesis must be testable, however there is a significantly more grounded necessity that a testable speculation must meet before it can truly be viewed as logical. This foundation comes essentially from crafted by the rationalist of science Karl Popper, and is called "falsifiability".
Answer:
E 1: cyclohexene
Explanation:
This reaction is an example of the dehydration of cyclic alcohols. The reaction proceeds in the following steps;
1) The first step of the process is the protonation of the cyclohexanol by the acid. This now yields H2O^+ attached to the cyclohexane ring.
2) the water molecule, which a good leaving group now leaves yielding a carbocation. This now leaves a cyclohexane carbocation which is highly reactive.
3) A water molecule now abstracts a proton from the carbon adjacent to the carbocation leading to the formation of cyclohexene and the regeneration of the acid catalyst. This is an E1 mechanism because it proceeds via a carbocation intermediate and not a concerted transition state, hence the answer.
Answer:
The law is observed in the given equation.
Explanation:
CaCO₃ + 2HCI → CaCI₂ +H₂O + CO₂
In order to find out if the law of conservative mass is followed, we need to <u>count how many atoms of each element are there in both sides of the equation</u>:
- Ca ⇒ 1 on the left, 1 on the right.
- C ⇒ 1 on the left, 1 on the right.
- O ⇒ 3 on the left, 3 on the right.
- H ⇒ 2 on the left, 2 on the right.
- Cl ⇒ 2 on the left, 2 on the right.
As the numbers for all elements involved are the same, the law is observed in the given equation.
Physical. When you simply desolve something with water, to don't actually change it. This action can be undone.
An example of a chemical reaction is when the cells within completely change. You you burn wood, you can't go back in time and un-burn it. Does that make sense?
