I thinks its He uses proof to show the evidence is relevant. But im not totally positive on it hope this helps
Answer:
we assume that it starts with a velocity of 10m/s. At 2m height above ground level, its velocity decreases at 3m above ground level
for its way down the velocity at 3m on its way down is more than its velocity at 2m on its way down.
Explanation:
A student throws a small rock straight upwards. The rock rises to its highest point and then falls back down. How does the speed of the rock at 2m on the way down compare with its speed at 2m on the way up?
It decreases in speed on its way down and increases in speed on its way down.
it decreases in speed on its way up because the the vertical motion is against the earths gravitational pull on an object to the earth's center
.It increases in speed on his way down because its under the influence of gravity
from newton's equation of motion we can check by
using V^2=u^2+2as
we assume that it starts with a velocity of 10m/s. At 2m height above ground level, its velocity decreases at 3m above ground level
for its way down the velocity at 3m on its way down is more than its velocity at 2m on its way down.
Answer:
d) False. If the angular momentum is zero, it implies in electro without turning, which would create a collapse towards the nucleus, so in both models the moment must be different from zero
Explanation:
Affirmations
a) true. The orbits are accurate in the Bohr model and probabilistic in quantum mechanics
b) True. If both give the same results and use the same quantum number (n)
c) True. If in angular momentum it is quantized, in the Bohr model too but it does not justify it
d) False. If the angular momentum is zero, it implies in electro without turning, which would create a collapse towards the nucleus, so in both models the moment must be different from zero
