The refrigerator's coefficient of performance is 6.
The heat extracted from the cold reservoir Q cold (i.e., inside a refrigerator) divided by the work W required to remove the heat is known as the coefficient of performance, or COP, of a refrigerator (i.e., the work done by the compressor). The required inside temperature and the outside temperature have a significant impact on the COP.
As the inside temperature of the refrigerator decreases, its coefficient of performance decreases. The coefficient of performance (COP) of refrigeration is always more than 1.
The heat produced in the cold compartment, H = 780.0 J
Work done in ideal refrigerator, W = 130.0 J
Refrigerator's coefficient of performance = H/W
= 780/130
= 6
Therefore, the refrigerator's coefficient of performance is 6.
Energy conservation requires the exhaust heat to be = 780 + 130
= 910 J
Learn more about coefficient here:
brainly.com/question/18915846
#SPJ4
UUA, UUG, CUU, CUC, CUA and CUG
So the code CUU could mutate to CUC, CUA or CUG
Answer:
Explanation:
Given data:
L =2.00 *10^4 m
d = 18*10^4 m
M = 18 *10^6 kg
m_1 = 8*10^6 kg
Gravitational energy is given as
mass per unit length is given as
calculating potential energy
Explanation:
1) N₂ + O₂ → 2 NO
Kc = [NO]² / ([N₂] [O₂])
Set up an ICE table:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Initial&Change&Equilibrium\\N_{2}&0.114&-x&0.114-x\\O_{2}&0.114&-x&0.114-x\\NO&0&+2x&2x\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Initial%26Change%26Equilibrium%5C%5CN_%7B2%7D%260.114%26-x%260.114-x%5C%5CO_%7B2%7D%260.114%26-x%260.114-x%5C%5CNO%260%26%2B2x%262x%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Plug into the equilibrium equation and solve for x.
1.00×10⁻⁵ = (2x)² / ((0.114 − x) (0.114 − x))
1.00×10⁻⁵ = (2x)² / (0.114 − x)²
√(1.00×10⁻⁵) = 2x / (0.114 − x)
0.00316 = 2x / (0.114 − x)
0.00361 − 0.00316x = 2x
0.00361 = 2.00316x
x = 0.00018
The volume is 1.00 L, so the concentrations at equilibrium are:
[N₂] = 0.114 − x = 0.11382
[O₂] = 0.114 − x = 0.11382
[NO] = 2x = 0.00036
2(a) Cl₂ → 2 Cl
Kc = [Cl]² / [Cl₂]
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Initial&Change&Equilibrium\\Cl_{2}&2.0&-x&2.0-x\\Cl&0&+2x&2x\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Initial%26Change%26Equilibrium%5C%5CCl_%7B2%7D%262.0%26-x%262.0-x%5C%5CCl%260%26%2B2x%262x%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
1.2×10⁻⁷ = (2x)² / (2 − x)
1.2×10⁻⁷ (2 − x) = 4x²
2.4×10⁻⁷ − 1.2×10⁻⁷ x = 4x²
2.4×10⁻⁷ ≈ 4x²
x² ≈ 6×10⁻⁸
x ≈ 0.000245
2x ≈ 0.00049
2(b) F₂ → 2 F
Kc = [F]² / [F₂]
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Initial&Change&Equilibrium\\F_{2}&2.0&-x&2.0-x\\F&0&+2x&2x\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Initial%26Change%26Equilibrium%5C%5CF_%7B2%7D%262.0%26-x%262.0-x%5C%5CF%260%26%2B2x%262x%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
1.2×10⁻⁴ = (2x)² / (2 − x)
1.2×10⁻⁴ (2 − x) = 4x²
2.4×10⁻⁴ − 1.2×10⁻⁴ x = 4x²
2.4×10⁻⁴ ≈ 4x²
x² ≈ 6×10⁻⁵
x ≈ 0.00775
2x ≈ 0.0155
F₂ dissociates more, so Cl₂ is more stable at 1000 K.
Answer: Option (B) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
When model B shows three dimensional shape of the molecule then it becomes easier to visualize the exact shape or geometry of the molecule as we get to know how atoms are bonded together.
Therefore, with the help of this it would be easy to know the hybridization of molecule. Basically, we will get to know the type of molecule represented by model B.
Thus, we can conclude that the statement Model B shows the three-dimensional shape of the molecule, but Model A does not represents Model B better than Model A.
