All categories

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS ONE QUESTION

Physics

1 answer:

Ipatiy [6.2K]3 years ago

4 0

k = $\dfrac{ (\dfrac{h}{ \lambda} )^{2} }{2m}$

k = (6.626×10-¹⁹/590 × 10-⁹ )^{2} /2 × 1.673 × 10-²⁷

k = (1.12 × 10-³⁰)^2/3.346×10-²⁷

k = 1.25 × 10-⁶⁰ /3.346×10-²⁷

k = 0

ldk why, my answer is coming this :(

You might be interested in

Justin expends 600 W of power pushing a car 10 meters in 5 seconds. How much force must he exert

olganol [36]

The force he must exert is 300 N

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following does not represent a significant negative environmental impact of using nuclear fuel? a. air pollution b.

sasho [114]

The answer is a. mining.

3 0

3 years ago

Why sheets of newspaper can be used to keep ice cream cold and keep fish and chips hot?

stich3 [128]

Answer: Paper

Explanation: It is a insulator

7 0

4 years ago

Earth has a radius of 6370 km what is earth's mass?

Oliga [24]

Answer:

approx 6 × 10^24 kg is earth's mass

3 0

3 years ago

You take a couple of capacitors and connect them in series, to which you observe a total capacitance

Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

Approximately $\rm 5.7\; \mu F$ and approximately $29\; \rm \mu F$ .

Explanation:

Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ denote the capacitance of these two capacitors.

When these two capacitors are connected in parallel, the combined capacitance will be the sum of $C_1$ and $C_2$ . (Think about how connecting these two capacitors in parallel is like adding to the total area of the capacitor plates. That would allow a greater amount of charge to be stored.)

$C(\text{parallel}) = C_1 + C_2$ .

On the other hand, when these two capacitors are connected in series, the combined capacitance should satisfy:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{C(\text{series})} = \frac{1}{C_1} + \frac{1}{C_2}$ .

(Consider how connecting these two capacitors in series is similar to increasing the distance between the capacitor plates. The strength of the electric field ( $V$ ) between these plates will become smaller. That translates to a smaller capacitance if the amount of charge stored $(Q)$ stays the same.)

The question states that:

$C(\text{parallel}) = 35\; \rm \mu F$ , and
$C(\text{series}) = 4.8\; \rm \mu F$ .

Let the capacitance of these two capacitors be $x\; \rm \mu F$ and $y\; \rm \mu F$ . The two equations will become:

$\displaystyle \left\lbrace \begin{aligned}& x + y = 35 \\ & \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} = \frac{1}{4.8}\end{aligned}\right.$ .

From the first equation:

$y = 35 - x$ .

Hence, the $y$ in the second equation here can be replaced with $(35 - x)$ . That equation would then become:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{35 - x} = \frac{1}{4.8}$ .

Solve for $x$ :

$\displaystyle \frac{x + (35 - x)}{x \, (35 - x)} = \frac{1}{4.8}$ .

$x\, (35 - x) = 4.8$ .

$x^2 - 35 \, x + 168 = 0$ .

Solve this quadratic equation for $x$ :

$x \approx 5.7$ or $x \approx 29.3$ .

Substitute back into the equation $y = 35 - x$ for $y$ :

$x \approx 5.7$ and $y \approx 29.3$ , or
$x \approx 29.3$ and $x \approx 5.7$ .

In other words, these two capacitors have only one possible set of capacitances (even though the previous quadratic equation gave two distinct real roots.) The capacitances of the two capacitors would be approximately $5.7\; \rm \mu F$ and approximately $29\; \rm \mu F$ (both values are rounded to two significant digits.)

6 0

3 years ago