Answer:
Total Energy consumed = 146.94 kwh
Total cost = rs 587.76
Explanation:
Given:
3 bulbs each 60 watt [for 3 hours daily]
4 fans each 100 watt [for 8 hours daily
1 electric heater of 2 kWh (2,000 watt) [for half hour daily
]
Rate = rs 4/Kwh
Find:
Total Energy consumed
Total cost
Computation:
Energy used = Power × time
3 bulbs each 60 watt [for 3 hours daily] = 3 x 60 x 3 x 31 = 16,740 watt = 16.74 kw
4 fans each 100 watt [for 8 hours daily = 4 x 100 x 8 x 31 = 99,200 watt = 99.2 kw
1 electric heater of 2 kWh [for half hour daily
] = 1 x 2000 x (1/2) x 31 = 31,000 watt = 31 kw
Total Energy consumed = 16.74 + 99.2 + 31
Total Energy consumed = 146.94 kwh
Total cost = 146.94 x 4
Total cost = rs 587.76
Answer:
the shortest distance to the obstruction is 0.431 m
Explanation:
We can see this system as an air column, where the plumber is open and where the water is closed, in the case when he hears the sound there is a phenomenon of resonance and superposition of waves with constructive interference.
For the lowest resonance we must have a node where the water is and a maximum where the plumber is a quarter of the wavelength
λ = ¼ L
If we are in a major resonance specifically the following resonance. We have a full wavelength plus a quarter of the wavelength
λ = 4L / 3
The general formula is
λ = 4L / n n = 1, 3, 5, 7,…
In addition the wave speed is the product of the frequency by the wavelength
v = λ f
Let's replace
v = (4L / n) f
L = v n / (4 f)
Now we can calculate the depth or length of the air column
If we have the first standing wave n = 1
L = 340 1 / (4 197)
L = 0.431 m
If it is the second resonance n = 3
L = 340 3 / (4 197)
L = 1.29 m
We can see the shortest distance to the obstruction is 0.431 m
French fries were on your car
Answer:The slope in the velocity-time graph represents the acceleration. The slope is defined as the ratio of change in y-axis to change in the x-axis. The slope is represented by the letter m and following is the general formula used for determining the slope:
Explanation:
The correct answer is B.
Let us think of the classical theory first. In the classical theory, light is a wave that gives energy. This energy gradually helps the electron jump to a higher energy level.
In quantum theory, this is wrong; an electron cannot absorb a small amout of energy because there is not close enough state to jump to with that energy; only very specific amounts of energy lead to a change in orbital levels/ absorbance of energy. Also, each pair of energy levels has a specific energy difference that is needed from an electron so that it can move.
Hence, B is correct; all other sentences describe classical models of light-electron interactions
