All categories

3 years ago

A car accelerates for 10 seconds. During this time, the angular

Physics

1 answer:

bagirrra123 [75]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

the angular acceleration of the car is 1.5 rad/s²

Explanation:

Given;

initial angular velocity, $\omega_i$ = 10 rad/s

final angular velocity, $\omega_f$ = 25 rad/s

time of motion, t = 10 s

The angular acceleration of the car is calculated as follows;

$a_r = \frac{\omega_f - \omega_i }{t} \\\\a_r = \frac{25-10}{10} = 1.5 \ rad/s^2$

Therefore, the angular acceleration of the car is 1.5 rad/s²

You might be interested in

1. What is the efficiency of a heat engine that does 1250 J of work and gives off 5250 J of heat to

vladimir2022 [97]

answer: in pic

explanation: found it here http://gaaq.weebly.com/uploads/7/8/8/4/78844490/chapter_11_q_as.pdf

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You have two resistors with the same cross sectional area and resistivity. Resistor A has length L1 and resistor B has length L2

oee [108]

Answer:

Explanation:

Given

Resistor A has length $L_1$

and Resistor B has Length $L_2$

and Resistance is given by

$R=\frac{\rho L}{A}$

Considering $\rho$ and A to be constant thus

$R_2>R_1$ because $L_2>L_1$

(a)When they are connected in series

As the current in series is same and power is $i^2R$

therefore $P_2>P_1$ as R is greater for second resistor

(b)if they are connected in Parallel

In Parallel connection Voltage is same

$P=\frac{V^2}{R}$

resistance of 2 is greater than 1 thus Power delivered by 1 is greater than 2

8 0

3 years ago

How long does it take the earth to rotate?

zubka84 [21]

It takes Earth 23 hours and 56 minutes to rotate. To be accurate.
Or you can just say 24 hours.
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU! ^_^

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is work being done if you push a child in a wagon

Leto [7]

yes. youre using energy to make the wagon with the child in the wagon

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An attacker at the base of a castle wall 3.65 m high throws a rock straight up with speed 7.4m/s from a height of 1.55m above th

Natali5045456 [20]

a) Yes, the rock will reach the top

b) The final speed is 3.7 m/s

c) The change in speed is 2.4 m/s

d) The change in speed in the two situations do not agree

e) Because the kinetic energy depends quadratically on the speed, $K\propto v^2$

Explanation:

The mechanical energy of the rock at the moment it is thrown from the ground is equal to the sum of its kinetic energy and its potential energy:

$E=KE_i + PE_i = \frac{1}{2}mu^2 + mgh_i$

where

m is the mass of the rock

u = 7.4 m/s is the inital speed

$g=9.8 m/s^2$ is the acceleration of gravity

$h_i = 1.55 m$ is the initial height of the rock

Substituting, we find the initial mechanical energy of the rock

$E=\frac{1}{2}m(7.4)^2 + m(9.8)(1.55)=42.6m$ [J]

In order to reach the top of the castle, the rock should have a mechanical energy of at least

$E' = mgh'$

where

h' = 3.65 m is the heigth of the top

Substituting,

$E'=m(9.8)(3.65)=35.6m$ [J]

Since E > E', it means that the rock has enough mechanical energy to reach the top.

The final mechanical energy of the rock at the top is

$E=mgh'+ \frac{1}{2}mv^2$ (1)

where:

v is the final speed of the rock at the top

Since the mechanical energy is conserved, this should be equal to the initial mechanical energy:

$E=42.6 m$ [J] (2)

Therefore, equating (1) and (2), we can find the final speed of the rock:

$mgh' + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = 42.6m\\v=\sqrt{2(42.6-gh')}=\sqrt{2(42.6-(9.8)(3.65))}=3.7 m/s$

Since the motion of the rock is a free fall motion (constant acceleration equal to the acceleration of gravity), we can use the following suvat equation:

$v^2 - u^2 = 2as$

where

v is the final speed, at the bottom

u = 7.4 m/s is the initial speed of the rock, at the top

$a=9.8 m/s^2$ is the acceleration of gravity

s = 3.65 - 1.55 = 2.1 m is the vertical displacement of the rock

Solving for v, we find the final speed:

$v=\sqrt{u^2+2as}=\sqrt{7.4^2 + 2(9.8)(2.1)}=9.8 m/s$

Therefore, the change in speed is

$\Delta v = v-u = 9.8 - 7.4 =2.4 m/s$

In the first situation (rock thrown upward), we have:

u = 7.4 m/s (initial speed)

v = 3.7 m/s (final speed)

So the change in speed is

$\Delta v = v-u =3.7 - 7.4 = -3.7 m/s$

While the change in speed in the second situation (rock thrown downward) is

$\Delta v = 2.4 m/s$

Therefore, we see that their magnitudes do not agree.

In both situations, the change in kinetic energy of the rock is equal in magnitude to the change in gravitational potential energy, since the total mechanical energy is conserved.

The change in gravitational potential energy in the two situations is the same (because the change in height is the same), therefore the change in kinetic energy in the two situations is also the same.

However, the kinetic energy of the rock is not directly proportional to the speed, but to the square of the speed:

$K\propto v^2$

Since the initial speed is the same for both situation (7.4 m/s), but the change in kinetic energy has opposite sign in the two situations (negative when the rock is thrown upward, positive when thrown downward), the situation is not symmetrical, therefore in order to have the same magnitude of change in the kinetic energy, the change in speed must be larger when the kinetic energy involved is lower, so in the first situation.

Learn more about kinetic energy and about potential energy:

brainly.com/question/6536722

brainly.com/question/1198647

brainly.com/question/10770261

#LearnwithBrainly

6 0

4 years ago