Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3000 600
5000 1000
6000 1200
7500 1500
No it doesn't form a proportional relationship because yes, the ratio is constant AFTER the 5,000, you do need to hit the 5,000 first, and then it changes. So no, it's not proportional because it isn't constant throughout the entirety of the relationship. If you're just going based on the table in question, then yes it will be proportional since it doesn't have the 5,000 in it but if you're looking at it in it's entirety, no it's not.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
May I please see the graph?
So in matt's equation, he made a mistake in the a transision from line 2 to line 3
in line 2: -4(-2)2
in line 3: -4(4)
the mistake is that -2 times 2 is not equal +4 it is equal to -4
also from lines 5 to 6 he made a mistake in order of opperations (mulit division then addition and subtract)
line 5: -10+30/5
line 6: 20/5
so he first subtracted 10 then divided, he should have divided then subtracted
so the equation should have equaled
Karen used the correct (-) times (+) property and the order of operations
so Karen is correct and Matt is wrong.
Given the length of the pencil, the length of the marker is 130.8 millimeters.
<h3>What are percentages?</h3>
Percentage can be described as a fraction of an amount expressed as a number out of hundred. Percentages are represented %.
<h3>How long is the marker?</h3>
Length of the marker = (1 + percentage) x length of the pencil
(1.09) x 120 = 130.8 millimeters
To learn more about percentages, please check: brainly.com/question/25764815
