Ask question

Ask question

All categories

Varvara68 [4.7K]

3 years ago

8

A car, X, with a mass of 1500 kg is moving west with an acceleration of 0.50 m/s2. A second car, Y, of equal mass is heading eas

t with an acceleration of 1.0 m/s2. Which of the following statements best describes the net force acting on each car?

1 answer:

ehidna [41]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

You might be interested in

An electrician finds that a 1 m length of a certain type of wire has a resistance of 0.24 Ω . What is the total resistance of th

zlopas [31]

The resistance of a given conductor depends on its electrical resistivity ( $\rho$ ), its length(L) and its cross-sectional area (A), as follows:

$R=\frac{\rho L}{A}$

In this case, we have $L'=138L$ , $\rho'=\rho$ and $A'=A$ . So, the total resistance of the wire with length of 138m is:

$R'=\frac{\rho' L'}{A'}\\R'=\frac{\rho 138L}{A}\\R'=138\frac{\rho L}{A}\\R'=138R\\R'=138(0.24\Omega)\\R'=33.12\Omega$

5 0

3 years ago

If I drop a watermelon from the top of one of the tower dorms at CSU, and it takes 3.34 seconds to hit the ground, calculate how

WINSTONCH [101]

T= 3.34

Vi= 0

A= 9.81

D= ?

d=Vit+1/2at^2

d= 1/2(9.81)(3.34)2

d= 54.7 or 55 meters tall

4 0

3 years ago

The equation v=F^aL^M^-c were shows the relationship between velocity of the waves tensile force in the string length, L and mas

Travka [436]

I literally looked everywhere for the answer, and I still found nothing. I hope you get it right. Sorry.

8 0

2 years ago

Amplitude and energy are inversely related, meaning that a high-energy wave has low amplitude and a low-energy wave has high amp

Elodia [21]

According to the physical fact that a<span>mplitude and energy have proportional values, this statement is definitely FALSE. Pay attention on the words ''</span><span> inversely related'', that will be the main point which will make it absolutely clear. Hope you will find this answer helpful! Regards.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

How much voltage is in the primary coil if there are 3200 windings in the

Lesechka [4]

Answer:

Voltage in primary coil is 3.91 V

Explanation:

For transformer we know that the working principle is given as

$\frac{V_1}{V_2} = \frac{N_1}{N_2}$

here we know that

$V_1 [tex] = voltage in primary coil[tex]V_2 = 25 V$

$N_1 = 500$

$N_2 = 3200$

Now we have

$\frac{V_1}{25} = \frac{500}{3200}$

$V_1 = 3.91 V$

8 0

3 years ago