3x - y = 9
y = -2x + 11
3x - (-2x + 11) = 9
3x + 2x - 11 = 9
3x + 2x = 9 + 11
5x = 20
x = 20/5
x = 4
y = -2x + 11
y = -2(4) + 11
y = -8 + 11
y = 3
solution (where the lines intersect) is (4,3)
I think you want the least common multipule (exg LCM of 2,3,4 is 12)
so we find the factors and include all of them so like this
15=3 times 5
12=2 times 2 times 3
8=2 times 2 times 2
so to include all of them we include 3 2's, 1 3 and 1 5 or 2 times 2 times 2 times 3 times 5 or 8 times 15 or 4 times 30 or 120
the LCM is 120
so 4/15=32/120
1/12=10/120
3/8=45/120
add 32/120+10/120+45/120=(32+10+45)/120=87/120
I think it’s going to be 7! Because since the other triangle is 1 and 3 it’s just 2 more so I just added to more to 5 getting me 7!! I think lol
Two triangles are said to be <u>congruent</u> if they have <em>similar</em> properties. Thus the required <u>options</u> to complete the <em>paragraph proof</em> are:
a. angle 1 is <u>congruent</u> to angle 2.
b. <em>alternate</em> angles are <u>congruent</u> if two parallel lines are cut by a <em>transversal</em>.
c. 
= 
The <em>similarity property</em> of two or more shapes implies that the <u>shapes</u> are congruent. Thus they have the <em>same</em> properties.
From the given <u>diagram</u> in the question, it can be deduced that
ΔABC ≅ ΔABE (<em>substitution</em> property of equality)
Given that EA is <u>parallel</u> to BD, then:
i. <2 ≅ <3 (<em>corresponding</em> angle property)
ii. <1 ≅ < 4 (<em>alternate</em> angle property)
Thus, the required options to complete the <em>paragraph proof</em> are:
- Angle 1 is <em>congruent</em> to angle 2.
- Alternate angles are <u>congruent</u> if two parallel lines are cut by a <em>transversal</em>.
- =
For more clarifications on the properties of congruent triangles, visit: brainly.com/question/1619927
#SPJ1
The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is P = 2L + 2W, where L is the length and W is the width. Because we don't know either the length or the width we can't solve the problem...too many unknowns. BUT we do have some information that will help with this problem. We are told that the length is 2 feet longer than the width, so we can use that: L = W+2. Now we can make the substitution into the formula along with the value for the perimeter that was given to us: 36=2(W+2) + 2W, and 36 = 2W + 4 + 2W; 36 = 4W + 4; 32 = 4W and W = 8. Now go back to where you said that the length is 2 feet longer than the width. If the width is 8, then 8+2 = 10 for the length.
