Answer:
Explanation:
Here, we want to convert J to cal
Mathematically:
Thus, to get our answer in cal, we divide the value given by 4.186
We have that as:
Answer:
He is wrong . Most accurate is Buret .
Explanation:
The number of significant figure denotes the level of accuracy of a measurement .
Beaker can measure liquid in mL upto significant figure of 2 . That means it can measure volume in terms of 10 , 20 , 30mL etc . It can not measure 25 mL
accurately . The last figure of 28 mL is read by guess in the question . So it is not an accurate measurement .
Similarly , graduated cylinder can measure liquid upto significant figure of 3 . That means it can measure volume in terms of 11 , 22 , 33 mL etc . It can not measure 25.5 mL accurately . The last figure of 28.3 mL is read by guess in the question . So it is less accurate measurement .
Similarly , buret can measure liquid upto significant figure of 4 . That means it can measure volume in terms of 11.2 , 22.3 , 33.5 mL etc . It can not measure 25.53 mL accurately . The last figure of 28.32 mL is read by guess in the question . So it is most accurate among all the three instrument because it can measure accurately mL upto one tenth of it .
The answer is 4.9 moles.
Solution:
Using the equation for boiling point elevation Δt,
Δt = i Kb m
we can rearrange the expression to solve for the molality m of the solution:
m = Δt / i Kb
Since we know that pure water boils at 100 °C, and the Ebullioscopic constant Kb for water is 0.512 °C·kg/mol,
m = (105°C - 100°C) / (2 * 0.512 °C·kg/mol)
= 4.883 mol/kg
From the molality m of the solution of salt added in a kilogram of water, we can now find the number of moles of salt:
m = number of moles / 1.0kg
number of moles = m*1.0kg
= (4.883 mol/kg) * (1.0kg)
= 4.9 moles
Answer:
.694 moles
Explanation: do given over one so 12.5 over 1 then multiply that by 1 over 18.01528( atomic mass of water) and then you get ans answear that you sig fig but i did that for you
