Ask question

Ask question

All categories

4 years ago

11

For question #13, use the following picture: 13. The picture is a model of a nitrogen atom. What is incorrect about the atomic o

rbital arrangement of electrons in this model and how should they be arranged?

1 answer:

valentinak56 [21]4 years ago

8 0

the electrons should be in the outer valence levels/shells.

You might be interested in

What is the net force acting on this box?

inn [45]

Positive 2n to the right of the box

6 0

3 years ago

MrRissso [65]

is the answer is the b

Explanation:

sbdjjdndndfff

5 0

3 years ago

A proton is moved from the negative to the positive plate of a parallel-plate arrangement. The plates are 1.50 cm apart, and the

Nana76 [90]

(a) The proton’s potential energy change is 3.6 x 10⁻¹⁸ J.

(b) The potential difference between the negative plate and a point midway between the plates is 11.25 V.

(c) The speed of the proton just before it hits the negative plate is 6.57 x 10⁴ m/s.

<h3>Potential energy of the proton</h3>

U = qΔV

where;

q is charge of the proton
ΔV is potential difference

U = q(Ed)

U = (1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹)(1500 x 1.5 x 10⁻²)

U = 3.6 x 10⁻¹⁸ J

<h3>Potential difference between the negative plate and a point midway</h3>

ΔV = E(0.5d)

ΔV = 0.5Ed

ΔV = 0.5 (1500)(1.5 x 10⁻²)

ΔV = 11.25 V

<h3>Speed of the proton </h3>

U = ¹/₂mv²

U = mv²

v² = 2U/m

where;

m is mass of proton = 1.67 x 10⁻²⁷ kg

v² = (2 x 3.6 x 10⁻¹⁸) / ( 1.67 x 10⁻²⁷)

v² = 4.311 x 10⁹

v = √(4.311 x 10⁹)

v = 6.57 x 10⁴ m/s

Thus, the proton’s potential energy change is 3.6 x 10⁻¹⁸ J.

The potential difference between the negative plate and a point midway between the plates is 11.25 V.

The speed of the proton just before it hits the negative plate is 6.57 x 10⁴ m/s.

Learn more about potential difference here: brainly.com/question/24142403

#SPJ1

4 0

2 years ago

Effciency of a lever is never 100% or more. why?Give reason

Troyanec [42]

Answer:

Ideally, the work output of a lever should match the work input. However, because of resistance, the output power is nearly always be less than the input power. As a result, the efficiency would go below $100\%$ .

Explanation:

In an ideal lever, the size of the input and output are inversely proportional to the distances between these two forces and the fulcrum. Let $D_\text{in}$ and $D_\text{out}$ denote these two distances, and let $F_\text{in}$ and $F_\text{out}$ denote the input and the output forces. If the lever is indeed idea, then:

$F_\text{in} \cdot D_\text{in} = F_\text{out} \cdot D_\text{out}$ .

Rearrange to obtain:

$\displaystyle F_\text{in} = F_\text{out} \cdot \frac{D_\text{out}}{D_\text{in}}$

Class two levers are levers where the perpendicular distance between the fulcrum and the input is greater than that between the fulcrum and the output. For this ideal lever, that means $D_\text{in} > D_\text{out}$ , such that $F_\text{in} < F_\text{out}$ .

Despite $F_\text{in} < F_\text{out}$ , the amount of work required will stay the same. Let $s_\text{out}$ denote the required linear displacement for the output force. At a distance of $D_\text{out}$ from the fulcrum, the angular displacement of the output force would be $\displaystyle \frac{s_\text{out}}{D_\text{out}}$ . Let $s_\text{in}$ denote the corresponding linear displacement required for the input force. Similarly, the angular displacement of the input force would be $\displaystyle \frac{s_\text{in}}{D_\text{in}}$ . Because both the input and the output are on the same lever, their angular displacement should be the same:

$\displaystyle \frac{s_\text{in}}{D_\text{in}} =\frac{s_\text{out}}{D_\text{out}}$ .

Rearrange to obtain:

$\displaystyle s_\text{in}=s_\text{out} \cdot \frac{D_\text{in}}{D_\text{out}}$ .

While increasing $D_\text{in}$ reduce the size of the input force $F_\text{in}$ , doing so would also increase the linear distance of the input force $s_\text{in}$ . In other words, $F_\text{in}$ will have to move across a longer linear distance in order to move $F_\text{out}$ by the same $s_\text{out}$ .

The amount of work required depends on both the size of the force and the distance traveled. Let $W_\text{in}$ and $W_\text{out}$ denote the input and output work. For this ideal lever:

$\begin{aligned}W_\text{in} &= F_\text{in} \cdot s_\text{in} \\ &= \left(F_\text{out} \cdot \frac{D_\text{out}}{D_\text{in}}\right) \cdot \left(s_\text{out} \cdot \frac{D_\text{in}}{D_\text{out}}\right) \\ &= F_\text{out} \cdot s_\text{out} = W_\text{out}\end{aligned}$ .

In other words, the work input of the ideal lever is equal to the work output.

The efficiency of a machine can be measured as the percentage of work input that is converted to useful output. For this ideal lever, that ratio would be $100\%$ - not anything higher than that.

On the other hand, non-ideal levers take in more work than they give out. The reason is that because of resistance, $F_\text{in}$ would be larger than ideal:

$\displaystyle F_\text{in} = F_\text{out} \cdot \frac{D_\text{out}}{D_\text{in}} + F(\text{resistance})$ .

As a result, in real (i.e., non-ideal) levers, the work input will exceed the useful work output. The efficiency will go below $100\%$ ,

4 0

3 years ago

Light could be thought of as a stream of tiny particles discharged by _______ objects that travel in straight paths. *

Gelneren [198K]

Answer: Light could be thought of as a stream of tiny particles discharged by luminous objects that travel in straight paths.

Explanation:

We can define "radiation" as the transmision of energy trough waves or particles.

Particularly, light is a form of electromagnetic radiation, so the "tiny particles" of light are discharged by a radiating object, particularly we can be more explicit and call it a luminous object, in this way we are being specific about the nature of the radiation of the object.

5 0

3 years ago