Answer:
See below
Explanation:
You have to heat the calorimeter to 100 C from 20 C
this will take .20 kg * 390 j /kg-C * 80 C = <u>6240 j</u>
You have to heat the mass of water to boiling point (100 C ) from 20C
this will take
.50 kg * 4182 j/kg-C * 80 = <u>167,280 j </u>
AND you have to add enough heat to boil off .03 kg of water:
.03 kg * (2260000 j/kg-C ) =<u> 67,800 j</u>
<u />
Power = joules / sec = (6240 + 167280 + 67800) / 274.8 =<u> 878 watts </u>
<u />
<u>Your answer may differ just a bit for slightly different or rounded values of specific heat or heat of fusion for water .....</u>
The source of information was biased. It was like walking along a river bank in the country and asking everybody you meet whether they like fishing. Or asking 500 people sitting in the bleachers whether they like baseball.
I'm sure the scientist would have gotten different data if she interviewed 500 teenagers at neighborhood basketball courts, or 500 teenagers at a rock concert.
Answer:
1700 Joules
Explanation:
Work=force x distance
Force = 170 kg
Distance= 10 Meters
170 x 10 = 1700 Joules of work
Answer:
C. Fill two identical pots with equal volumes of salt water and tap water and use a stopwatch to determine the time it takes each pot to boil.
Explanation:
<u>A) is incorrect</u> because Peter should have the same testing environment for both of his experiments.
He should choose the same method of boiling the salt water and tap water because the stovetop and the microwave could also affect the results and make them unreliable.
<u>B) is incorrect</u> because Peter should not estimate the time it takes the salt water and tap water to boil.
Peter should measure and record the amount of time that it takes these substances to boil in order to have an accurate, valid experimental thesis.
<u>C) is correct</u> because Peter uses the same volume of salt water and tap water, fills them into two identical pots, and uses a stopwatch to determine the amount of time it takes each pot to boil.
The stopwatch makes the experiment more valid and accurate compared to the previous methods, and the identical pots and amounts of water help this experiment become even more precise.
<u>D) is incorrect</u> because the variables in the experiment are not controlled amounts and will therefore produce an inaccurate and invalid experiment.
The horizontal and vertical components of a projectile's velocity are independent of each other.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The path of a projectile is determined by two components of motion. They are termed as horizontal and the vertical components. Since both components velocity are perpendicular to each other, so it can stated that they are independent of each other.
Even it can seen that when the horizontal components of velocity is constant, then there will be change in the vertical components of velocity leading to free fall projectile path.
And in the absence of gravity, there will be change in the horizontal components of velocity with zero vertical component of velocity. Thus, the horizontal and the vertical components of a projectile’s velocity are seemed to be independent of each other.
