All categories

3 years ago

The biosphere is made of different kinds of matter. Which substance is an

Chemistry

2 answers:

klasskru [66]3 years ago

4 0

A. iron is an example of inorganic matter

Elina [12.6K]3 years ago

3 0

A (iron) is inorganic

You might be interested in

An ideal gas (C}R), flowing at 4 kmol/h, expands isothermally at 475 Kfrom 100 to 50 kPa through a rigid device. If the power pr

Zina [86]

<u>Answer:</u> The rate of heat flow is 3.038 kW and the rate of lost work is 1.038 kW.

<u>Explanation:</u>

We are given:

$C_p=\frac{7}{2}R\\\\T=475K\\P_1=100kPa\\P_2=50kPa$

Rate of flow of ideal gas , n = 4 kmol/hr = $\frac{4\times 1000mol}{3600s}=1.11mol/s$ (Conversion factors used: 1 kmol = 1000 mol; 1 hr = 3600 s)

Power produced = 2000 W = 2 kW (Conversion factor: 1 kW = 1000 W)

We know that:

$\Delta U=0$ (For isothermal process)

So, by applying first law of thermodynamics:

$\Delta U=\Delta q-\Delta W$

$\Delta q=\Delta W$ .......(1)

Now, calculating the work done for isothermal process, we use the equation:

$\Delta W=nRT\ln (\frac{P_1}{P_2})$

where,

$\Delta W$ = change in work done

n = number of moles = 1.11 mol/s

R = Gas constant = 8.314 J/mol.K

T = temperature = 475 K

$P_1$ = initial pressure = 100 kPa

$P_2$ = final pressure = 50 kPa

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$\Delta W=1.11mol/s\times 8.314J\times 475K\times \ln (\frac{100}{50})\\\\\Delta W=3038.45J/s=3.038kJ/s=3.038kW$

Calculating the heat flow, we use equation 1, we get:

[ex]\Delta q=3.038kW[/tex]

Now, calculating the rate of lost work, we use the equation:

$\text{Rate of lost work}=\Delta W-\text{Power produced}\\\\\text{Rate of lost work}=(3.038-2)kW\\\text{Rate of lost work}=1.038kW$

Hence, the rate of heat flow is 3.038 kW and the rate of lost work is 1.038 kW.

4 0

3 years ago

Why is it impossible to ever prove that a hypothesis is true?

maria [59]

Answer: A

Explanation:

Hypothesis have to be based on previous knowledge and have to be able to be tested but the problem is most hypothesis can’t be explained so it’s impossible to prove a hypothesis correct because science uses inductive reasoning

4 0

4 years ago

Balance the following equations:

lesya [120]

<h2>Hey There!</h2><h2>_____________________________________</h2><h2>Answer:</h2><h2>_____________________________________</h2>

(I) $N_{2} + 3H_{2} --> 2NH_{3}$

(II) $P_{4} + 5O_{2} --> 2P_{2} O_{5}$

(III) $2NaF + Br_{2} -->2NaBr + F_{2}$

(IV) $2ZnS + 3O_{2} --> 2ZnO + 2SO_2$

(V) $Pb(NO_3)_2 + 2NaCl --> 2NaNO_3 + PbCl_2$

<h2>_____________________________________</h2><h2>Best Regards,</h2><h2>'Borz'</h2>

7 0

3 years ago

How many atoms of carbon are in a container that has 0.450 mol of CO2 and 2.55 mol of CaC2?

Fantom [35]

Answer:

The number of carbon atoms in the container is 1.806 × 10²⁴ or the container contains 1.806 × 10²⁴ atoms of carbon

Explanation:

By Avogadro's number, 1 mole of a substance contains 6.02 × 10²³ particles of the substance

Here we have 0.45 mole of CO₂ contains

0.45 × 6.02 × 10²³ particles of CO₂ that is 2.709 × 10²³ particles of CO₂ or equivalent to 2.709 × 10²³ atoms of Carbon

Similarly, 2.55 moles of CaC₂ contains 2.55 × 6.02 × 10²³ particles of CaC₂ or 1.5351 × 10²⁴ atoms of Carbon

The total number of carbon atoms is therefore;

2.709 × 10²³ + 1.5351 × 10²⁴ = 1.806 × 10²⁴ atoms of carbon.

5 0

4 years ago

An atom has 16 protons and 18 neutrons. Which symbol represents that atom, including its mass

AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

Sulfur, kill me if I'm wrong

4 0

4 years ago