The heat required to completely melt the given substance, platinum, we just have to convert first the given mass in mole and multiply the answer to its molar heat of fusion..
Hf = mass x (1/molar mass) x molar heat of fusion
Hf = (85.5 g) x (1 mole/195.08 g) x 4.70 kcal/mol
Hf = 2.06 kcal
Answer: 40.1%
Explanation: The mass of calcium in this compound is equal to 40.1 grams because there's one atom of calcium present and calcium has an atomic mass of 40.1 . The molar mass of the compound is 100.1 grams. Using the handy equation above, we get: Mass percent = 40.1 g Ca⁄100.1 g CaCO3 × 100% = 40.1% Ca.
<u>Answer:</u> The concentration of solute is 0.503 mol/L
<u>Explanation:</u>
To calculate the concentration of solute, we use the equation for osmotic pressure, which is:
where,
= osmotic pressure of the solution = 24 atm
i = Van't hoff factor = 2 (for NaCl)
c = concentration of solute = ?
R = Gas constant = 
T = temperature of the solution = ![25^oC=[273+25]=298K](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=25%5EoC%3D%5B273%2B25%5D%3D298K)
Putting values in above equation, we get:
Hence, the concentration of solute is 0.503 mol/L
Answer:
<em>This type of error affects overall accuracy but does not necessarily affect precision.</em> - Systematic error
<em>This type of error affects precision but does not necessarily affect overall accuracy.</em> - Random error
<em>This type of error occurs if you use a buret that was calibrated incorrectly when it was made.</em> - Systematic error
<em>You can minimize this type of error by taking repeated measurements.</em> - Random error
Explanation:
<em>Systematic errors are errors that are attributable to instrument being used during measurement or consistent incorrect measurement during a research</em>. They are consistently and repeatedly committed during measurements and therefore affect the overall accuracy of measurements. A person committing systematic error can have precise repeated measurement but will be far from being accurate.
R<em>andom errors on the other hand has no pattern and are usually unavoidable because they cannot be predicted.</em> When sufficient replicate measurements are made, such errors are reduced to the barest minimum and usually do not affect the overall accuracy of measurements.
