1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
3 years ago
5

Balance the equation C4H8 (g) + ?O2(g) → ? CO2 (g) + ? H2O (g), using the smallest possible integers. What is the coefficient of

CO2? ​
Chemistry
1 answer:
den301095 [7]3 years ago
7 0
The coefficients should be 1; 6; 4; 4 and the coefficient of CO2 is 4
You might be interested in
What if you love someone a lot but are to afraid to say it?
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Zodiac signs.

Explanation:

Cringe.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the mass of 0.28 mole of iron?
vredina [299]

Answer:

Your answer should be 15.68 grams.

Explanation:

Seeing as 1 mole has a mass of 56 g, 56*0.28 would get you 15.68 g.

6 0
3 years ago
2 1.1.4 Quiz: Chemistry of Living Systems
UNO [17]
ITS B. FASHO that’s what I’m think
7 0
3 years ago
Instructions
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

I got a 100 with this, sorry if this is not what you want just trying to help

Explanation:

1. This experiment was to find how mass and speed effect KE. This is important because if you were in a situation where you needed something to go higher, you would know to add more or less of mass/speed.  

To test mass, we filled the bean bag with a certain amount of water, then dropped it. After, you recorded how high it made the bean bag go. The same with speed, but same amount in the bottle, just dropped from different heights.  

My hypothesis is when you have more mass, the KE will be greater. This is also the same with speed, if it is dropped from a higher place, the bean bag will launch farther than the last time.  

2. Data I collected from the lab was like my hypothesis explained. When the height of the bottle increased, it made the bean bag go higher than the last. And I tested 4 different masses, 0.125 kg, 0.250kg, 0.375kg and 0.500kg. Each time the bean bag went higher on a larger mass.  

A lot of times on the speed test, the bean bag would go higher than the bottle drop point, but not every time. Also, when it was dropped from the same height each time, some results varied quite a bit, like when it was dropped from 1.28 the results were 1.14 then 1.30 1.30. Mass on the other hand was all in the same number range, only once the numbers were a bit off from each other.  

3.  Some formulas I used were KE= ½ mv^2 and Ht v^2/2g. The first was to calculate the kinetic energy of an object, m=mass v=speed. Second was for finding out what height I needed to drop something to reach a certain speed, Ht=Height and g= Gravitational Acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2.  

I used these to figure out tables that showed relationships between different things like mass and KE or speed and height. The whole time I was doing the lab, my data was going up, when there was more mass/speed there were higher values in the table.  

This means that my hypothesis at the beginning was correct, more of m/s means KE will increase proportionally because they are all linear. I found it surprising when the bean bag height went over the water bottle drop mark.  

4.     To conclude, my hypothesis matched my data. The data values went up when more mass or speed was added. This means if I were in a situation where I needed more kinetic energy for something, I would know to increase mass or the speed of the object giving it energy.  

The reason that this hypothesis is correct is when you have more mass, you have more energy. So, when you drop let's say a baseball, it isn’t that heavy so it would only launch the bean bag so far. But a bowling ball is very heavy and has lots of energy when falling because of that, it would make the bean bag go very high.  

To make this experiment better, I would use a smoother material for the lever so energy wouldn’t be lost by friction from wood rubbing together. Also, maybe a scanner or video camera to more accurately record how far the bean bag went. All of these would help the lab get more precise results, maybe they could be used in a future lab.

8 0
3 years ago
Which objects cannot be observed in detail without a microscope?
Sonbull [250]

The objects which cannot be observed in detail without a microscope

include the following:

  • Red blood cell
  • Bacterium

<h3>What is a Microscope?</h3>

A microscope is an instrument which is used to view smaller objects such as

microbe,cells, tissues etc. This instrument is used in viewing the different

cells found in the body as they can't be seen with the eye.

The remaining options which can be seen with the eyes don't require

the use of microscopes.

Read more about Microscope here brainly.com/question/25268499

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The reaction a(g) + 2b(g) c(g) was allowed to come to equilibrium. the initial amounts of reactants placed into a 5.00 l vessel
    6·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE 50 POINTS PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • If you start with 6 mol of nitrogen gas (N2+) what mass (g) of ammonia (NH4) will be produced?
    9·1 answer
  • Melted rock can ooze out from below earths surface through a crack in the crust called a(n)?
    10·1 answer
  • SUBSTANCE
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the ways in which ionic compound nomenclature differs from covalent compound nomenclature
    13·1 answer
  • Identify the type of solid for FeF3
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these is NOT a mixture?
    7·1 answer
  • How can you determine the number of shells in an atom of a certain element, based
    15·1 answer
  • Dehydration of tertiary alcohols occurs by what mechanism?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!