Recall that the main function of chloroplasts is to convert sunlight to chemical energy, or to carry out photosynthesis. Plant (and eukaryotic algae) cells contain these organelles, while animal cells do not, and hence, animals cannot carry out photosynthesis.
So, a lack of chloroplasts would mean that an organism would not be able to convert sunlight into chemical energy through photosynthesis.
Plants cells, and specifically the chloroplast organelle, are able to absorb sunlight, and together with CO₂ and water, produce glucose (for the plant to eat) and oxygen (which is released into the atmosphere). That glucose is further broken down by the plants' mitochondria. Animals directly consume the glucose to be broken down and converted into energy, hence why we do not have - nor need - chloroplasts in our cells.
Answer:
68,2%
Explanation:
Supposing the initial salt concentration of lake Parsons is the same of non-isolated lakes, 6,67L, and the change of salt concentration in isolated lake is just for water evaporation it is possible to write:
6,67gL⁻¹×X = 21gL⁻¹×Y
<em>-Where X is the initial water and Y is the water that remains in the isolated lake-</em>
Thus:
6,67X = 21Y
0,318 = Y/X
0,318 is the ratio of water that remains between total water. To obtain the ratio of evaporated water:
1-0,318 = 0,682
In percentage: <em>68,2%</em>
<em />
I hope it helps!
<em />
For the hypothesis put what you think will happen
