Complete question:
At a particular instant, an electron is located at point (P) in a region of space with a uniform magnetic field that is directed vertically and has a magnitude of 3.47 mT. The electron's velocity at that instant is purely horizontal with a magnitude of 2×10⁵ m/s then how long will it take for the particle to pass through point (P) again? Give your answer in nanoseconds.
[<em>Assume that this experiment takes place in deep space so that the effect of gravity is negligible.</em>]
Answer:
The time it will take the particle to pass through point (P) again is 1.639 ns.
Explanation:
F = qvB
Also;

solving this two equations together;

where;
m is the mass of electron = 9.11 x 10⁻³¹ kg
q is the charge of electron = 1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ C
B is the strength of the magnetic field = 3.47 x 10⁻³ T
substitute these values and solve for t

Therefore, the time it will take the particle to pass through point (P) again is 1.639 ns.
The kinetic energy of the child at the bottom of the incline is 106.62 J.
The given parameters:
- <em>Mass of the child, m = 16 kg</em>
- <em>Length of the incline, L = 2 m</em>
- <em>Angle of inclination, θ = 20⁰</em>
The vertical height of fall of the child from the top of the incline is calculated as;

The gravitational potential energy of the child at the top of the incline is calculated as;

Thus, based on the principle of conservation of mechanical energy, the kinetic energy of the child at the bottom of the incline is 106.62 J since no energy is lost to friction.
Learn more about conservation of mechanical energy here: brainly.com/question/332163
Answer: E = 941738.537J
Explanation:
to begin,
given that the mass = 2320 pound = 1052.334 kg
Δh = 110 ft = 33.528 m
given that distance (d) = 1283 ft = 391.058 m
also the speed (v) is 65 mph = 29.058 m/s
force (F) = 87 pounds = 386.995 N
from our knowledge in work energy theory;
E = Fd + 1/2mv² + mgh
E = (386.995 × 391.058) + (1/2×1052.334×29.058²) + (1052.334×9.81×33.528)
E = 151337.491 + 444278.2 + 346122.84
E = 941738.537J
i hope this helps, cheers.
The 109 Earth's the sun can hold over billion Earth's
I think this fits the definition of ethical relativism. does that sound right?