ANSWER:
F(h)= 230 N is the horizontal force you will need to move the pickup along the same road at the same speed.
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
F(h) is Horizontal Force = 200 N
V is Speed = 2.4 m/s
The total weight increase by 42%
coefficient of rolling friction decrease by 19%
Since the velocity is constant so acceleration is zero; a=0
Now the horizontal force required to move the pickup is equal to the frictional force.
F(h) = F(f)
F(h) = mg* u
m is mass
g is gravitational acceleration = 9.8 m/s^2
200 = mg*u
Since weight increases by 42% and friction coefficient decreases by 19%
New weight = 1+0.42 = 1.42 = (1.42*m*g)
New friction coefficient = μ = 1 - 0.19 = 0.81 = 0.81 u
F(h) = (0.81μ) (1.42 m g)
= (0.81) (1.42) (μ m g)
= (0.81) (1.42) (200)
= 230 N
Answer:
<em>The magnetic field through the coil at first increases steadily up to its maximum value, and then decreases gradually to its minimum value.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
At first, the magnet fall towards the coils; inducing a gradually increasing magnetic field through the coil as it falls into the coil. At the instance when half the magnet coincides with the coil, the magnetic field magnitude on the coil is at its maximum value. When the magnet falls pass the coil towards the floor, the magnetic field then starts to decrease gradually from a strong magnitude to a weak magnitude.
This action creates a changing magnetic flux around the coil. The result is that an induced current is induced in the coil, and the induced current in the coil will flow in such a way as to oppose the action of the falling magnet. This is based on lenz law that states that the induced current acts in such a way as to oppose the motion or the action that produces it.
Answer: Provided in the explanation
Explanation:
I have understood that I have been influenced by the 'affinity bias' for quite a while. It caused me to feel fascination and feel better and right about individuals who had comparable intrigue and thought designs. I sort of began to feel this is the one for me based on those likenesses yet later used to be miserable when I comprehended that those similitudes are not many and insufficient consistently. I have begun to beat this inclination by rehearsing self reflection. I have begun to think about what causes me to feel pulled in to somebody and on the off chance that I introspect that it's exclusively founded on likenesses, at that point I cause myself to get that and monitoring that helps in escaping the inclination.
I make an effort not to get into the snare of paradoxes in my own announcements yet I have been forced to bear deceptions during contentions. One deception which I have encountered most is the 'Foul play' error as there have been a great deal of occurrences when individuals began to tear down me and my family when they couldn't win on a contention regarding balanced and rationale.
Basic reasoning causes us in understanding our defects and those issues of our own which keeps us from taking better choices and furthermore forestalls us tackling issues in more successful manners. Through basic reasoning, one can reflect and recognize utilization of deceptions in the contentions and that will help him in deciphering the circumstance from an alternate perspective. He will assess the circumstance better and through appropriate induction, he will have the option to get over those issues in thinking and subsequently, have the option to take better and more powerful choices for taking care of an issue.
The most fascinating idea which I have learned is that of the utilization of reflection or explicitly self reflection to comprehend ourselves better and furthermore to display basic reasoning appropriately. Being said that, I am a still somewhat confused about the manners by which we can reflect appropriately at each circumstance in a successful manner. This disarray remains in light of the fact that most deceptions and predispositions are oblivious in nature while the basic considering aptitudes reflection is cognizant and I meander whether a cognizant ability will have the option to break down and distinguish each oblivious inclinations or whether a few guards will keep a few inclinations covered up.
Answer:
The difference in the length of the bridge is 0.42 m.
Explanation:
Given that,
Length = 1000 m
Winter temperature = 0°C
Summer temperature = 40°C
Coefficient of thermal expansion 
We need to calculate the difference in the length of the bridge
Using formula of the difference in the length
Where, 
= temperature difference
=Coefficient of thermal expansion
L= length
Put the value into the formula
Hence, The difference in the length of the bridge is 0.42 m.
me ajudem por favor pra agora de noite
