This problem is providing the mass, energy, initial temperature and specific heat of a sample of copper that is required to calculate the final temperature.
Thus, we recall the general heat equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c385b/c385b2ffad9dd1c8d6197f8b10d336b036387eaa" alt="Q=mC(T_f-T_i)\\"
Which has to be solved for the final temperature,
as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f69/70f69c2735552098f39fa3cea3e3048c113c366c" alt="T_f=T_i+\frac{Q}{mC}"
Finally, we plug in the numbers to obtain:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/465a6/465a68c471b54f8e4f60903e3803cdf5a28c0c13" alt="T_f=85\°C+\frac{600J}{35.66g*0.38\frac{J}{g\°C} } \\\\T_f=129.3\°C"
However, this result is not given in the choices.
Learn more:
Carbon is the element at the heart of all organic compounds, and it is such a versatile element because of its ability to form straight chains, branched chains, and rings. Because these chains and rings can have all sorts of different functional groups in all sorts of different ways (giving the compond all sorts of different physical and chemical properties), carbon's ability to form the backbone of these large structures is critial to the existence of most chemical compounds known to man. Above all, the organic molecules crucial to the biochemical systems that govern living organisms depend on carbon compounds.
Scientists repeat experiments for reliability. Experiments have to be repeated, since performing an experiment only once, does not prove a scientists theory on the experiment, which they develop by performing the experiment. And then performing the experiment again or even many times to prove or disapprove their theories. Btw, before an experiment begins, the scientist will make a hypothesis of what they believe will happen. If proven correctly, they would then use those results they record throughout the experiment, from beginning to end to prove whether or not their hypothesis are correct or incorrect. Click to let others know, how helpful is it
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/2613050#readmore
So that they can prove the other scientists views wrong and develop a new theory in which there is more sense and credibility.
Click to let others know, how helpful is it
BASICALLY, I THINK THE ANSWER IS 1 OR 2 OR
Answer:
1. A circuit is a path that electricity flows along. It starts at a power source, like a battery, and flows through a wire to a light bulb or other object and back to other side of the power source.
2. A series circuit is one that has more than one resistor, but only one path through which the electricity (electrons) flows. All the components in a series circuit are connected end-to-end. A resistor in a circuit is anything that uses some of the power from the cell.
3. A parallel circuit is a circuit in which the electric current passes through two or more branches or connected parts at the same time before it combines again. Compare.
4. BOTH - 1. lightbulb 2. battery 3. switch
SERIES- 1. Ammeter 2. voltmeter
i'm not sure about the rest sorry :(