1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLEGan [10]
3 years ago
14

Evauluate 37/100+3/10

Mathematics
2 answers:
Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

67/100

Step-by-step explanation:

37/100+3/10

Get a common denominator

37/100 + 3/10 *10/10

37/100+30/100

67/100

zheka24 [161]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

67/100

Step-by-step explanation:

Find common denominators, note that what you do to the denominator, you must do to the numerator.

The common denominator is 100:

(3/10)(10/10) = (3 * 10)/(10 * 10) = 30/100

Add:

37/100 + 30/100 = 67/100

67/100 is your answer.

~

You might be interested in
Hunter did not want to spend more than 150$ for a flight from Reno to Los Angeles. Write the inequality that models this situati
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

(a)\ x < 150

(b)\ x = 149; x = 148

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Amount = 150 --- not more than

x \to spending

Solving (a): Represent as an inequality

Not more than means <

So, the inequality is:

Spending < Amount

x < 150

Solving (b): The first two possible solutions

These are the numbers closest to 150 i.e. 149 and 148

Hence, x = 149; x = 148

7 0
3 years ago
Multiply me by 4 then subtract 13 if you divide me by 3 and add 17 you get 22
8_murik_8 [283]
You have to do the opposite

22-17=5
5x3=15
15+13=28
28/4=7

The answer is 7. You can check this by doing what it says and if it makes 22, it’s correct. (I’ve already checked it) :)
6 0
3 years ago
How do you graph this?
Gemiola [76]

Answer:

You need more information to graaph this.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Suppose the following number of defects has been found in successive samples of size 100: 6, 7, 3, 9, 6, 9, 4, 14, 3, 5, 6, 9, 6
Brut [27]

Answer:

Given the data in the question;

Samples of size 100: 6, 7, 3, 9, 6, 9, 4, 14, 3, 5, 6, 9, 6, 10, 9, 2, 8, 4, 8, 10, 10, 8, 7, 7, 7, 6, 14, 18, 13, 6.

a)

For a p chart ( control chart for fraction nonconforming), the center line and upper and lower control limits are;

UCL = p" + 3√[ (p"(1-P")) / n ]

CL = p"

LCL = p" - 3√[ (p"(1-P")) / n ]

here, p" is the average fraction defective

Now, with the 30 samples of size 100

p" =  [∑(6, 7, 3, 9, 6, 9, 4, 14, 3, 5, 6, 9, 6, 10, 9, 2, 8, 4, 8, 10, 10, 8, 7, 7, 7, 6, 14, 18, 13, 6.)] / [ 30 × 100 ]

p" = 234 / 3000

p" = 0.078

so the trial control limits for the fraction-defective control chart are;

UCL = p" + 3√[ (p"(1-P")) / n ]

UCL = 0.078 + 3√[ (0.078(1-0.078)) / 100 ]

UCL = 0.078 + ( 3 × 0.026817 )

UCL = 0.078 + 0.080451

UCL = 0.1585

LCL = p" - 3√[ (p"(1-P")) / n ]

LCL = 0.078 - 3√[ (0.078(1-0.078)) / 100 ]

LCL = 0.078 - ( 3 × 0.026817 )

LCL = 0.078 - 0.080451

LCL =  0 ( SET TO ZERO )

Diagram of the Chart uploaded below

b)

from the p chart for a) below, sample 28 violated the first western electric rule,

summary report from Minitab;

TEST 1. One point more than 3.00 standard deviations from the center line.

Test failed at points: 28

Hence, we conclude that the process is out of statistical control

Lets Assume that assignable causes can be found to eliminate out of control points.

Since 28 is out of control, we should eliminate this sample and recalculate the trial control limits for the P chart.

so

p" = 0.0745

UCL = p" + 3√[ (p"(1-P")) / n ]

UCL = 0.0745 + 3√[ (0.0745(1-0.0745)) / 100 ]

UCL = 0.0745 + ( 3 × 0.026258 )

UCL = 0.0745 + 0.078774

UCL = 0.1532

LCL  = p" - 3√[ (p"(1-P")) / n ]

LCL = 0.0745 - 3√[ (0.0745(1-0.0745)) / 100 ]

LCL = 0.0745 - ( 3 × 0.026258 )

LCL = 0.0745 - 0.078774

UCL = 0  ( SET TO ZERO )

The second p chart diagram is upload below;

NOTE; the red circle symbol on 28 denotes that the point is not used in computing the control limits

7 0
3 years ago
An engineer is going to redesign an ejection seat for an airplane. the seat was designed for pilots weighing between 130lb and 1
Vlad [161]

Answer: 0.4758

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : Mean : \mu=137\text{ lb}

Standard deviation : \sigma =28.9\text{ lb}

Also, the new population of pilots has normally distributed .

The formula to calculate the z-score :-

z=\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}

For x=130 lb .

z=\dfrac{130-137}{28.9}=-0.2422145\approx-0.24

For x=171lb.

z=\dfrac{171-137}{28.9}=1.1764705\approx1.18

The p-value =P(-0.24

=0.8809999-0.4051651=0.4758348\approx0.4758348\approx0.4758

Hence, the required probability : 0.4758

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the square root of 36 squared
    7·1 answer
  • the big wheel could have a 52 inch diameter and the small wheel could have an 18 inch diameter.What is the circumference of the
    12·1 answer
  • What statement makes the open sentence 49-7x=21 true?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the surface area of the sphere?
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the expression 2 + 3 ÷ y?
    6·1 answer
  • 2 Ryan has 250 pages remaining in his
    14·2 answers
  • I need help with this ​
    14·1 answer
  • What is the value of the expression shown? 10 - 16:2<br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=10%20-%2016%20%5Cdiv%202" id="TexFormu
    13·1 answer
  • Are these lines Parallel? <br><br>Super easy, just one pair of lines.​
    10·2 answers
  • Pentru a culege nectar 45 de albine au vizitat, intr-o singura exeditie, unele 60 flori, iar altele 75 de flori . Stiing=d ca au
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!