Complete question:
Two 10-cm-diameter charged rings face each other, 21.0 cm apart. Both rings are charged to +40.0 nC. What is the electric field strength at the midpoint between the two rings ?
Answer:
The electric field strength at the mid-point between the two rings is zero.
Explanation:
Given;
diameter of each ring, d = 10 cm = 0.1 m
distance between the rings, r = 21.0 cm = 0.21 m
charge of each ring, q = 40 nC = 40 x 10⁻⁹ C
let the midpoint between the two rings = x
The electric field strength at the midpoint between the two rings is given as;
![E_{mid} = E_{right} +E_{left}\\\\E_{right} = \frac{KQ}{(x^2 + r^2)^\frac{2}{3} } \\\\E_{leftt} = -\ \frac{KQ}{(x^2 + r^2)^\frac{2}{3} }\\\\E_{mid} = \frac{KQ}{(x^2 + r^2)^\frac{2}{3} } - \frac{KQ}{(x^2 + r^2)^\frac{2}{3} } = 0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E_%7Bmid%7D%20%3D%20E_%7Bright%7D%20%2BE_%7Bleft%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CE_%7Bright%7D%20%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BKQ%7D%7B%28x%5E2%20%2B%20r%5E2%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%20%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5CE_%7Bleftt%7D%20%20%3D%20-%5C%20%5Cfrac%7BKQ%7D%7B%28x%5E2%20%2B%20r%5E2%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%20%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CE_%7Bmid%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BKQ%7D%7B%28x%5E2%20%2B%20r%5E2%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%20%7D%20%20-%20%5Cfrac%7BKQ%7D%7B%28x%5E2%20%2B%20r%5E2%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%20%7D%20%3D%200)
Therefore, the electric field strength at the mid-point between the two rings is zero.
Answer:
No work is performed or required in moving the positive charge from point A to point B.
Explanation:
Lets take
Q= Positive charge which move from point A to point B along
Voltage difference,ΔV =V₁ - V₂
The work done
W = Q . ΔV
Given that charge is moved from point A to point B along an equipotential surface.It means that voltage difference is zero.
ΔV = 0
So
W = Q . ΔV
W = Q x 0
W= 0 J
So work is zero.
Answer:
C. Positively charged
Explanation:
The plum pudding model of the atom proposes by J. J. Thomson consisted of electrons which lay embedded as the raisins within a dough or soup that was positively charged. The electron was discovered by J. J. Thomson in 1897 through cathode ray tube experiments.
Based on the plum pudding model, if all the negatively charge electrons contained in an atom are removed, the material remaining will be the <em>positively charged</em> soup
<em><u>your </u></em><em><u>question</u></em><em><u>:</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<em>What are the two types of physical fitness?</em>
<em><u>answer:</u></em>
<em>The</em><em> </em><em>two </em><em>types </em><em>of </em><em>phys</em><em>ical </em><em>fitn</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>are </em><em>Health-related</em><em> physical fitness and Performance-related physical fitness.</em>
Answer:
"The lowest energy configuration for an atom is the one having the maximum number of unpaired electrons allowed by thePauli principle in a particular set of degenerate orbitals" is known as Hund's rule.
Explanation:
Pauli's Exclusion principle states that "two or more electrons can not have the same values of the set of all quantum numbers in an atom or a molecule".
So, the given statement <em>is not</em> Pauli's Exclusion principle.
Hund's rule states that the lowest energy configuration of an atom is that one in which the maximum number of parallel spins of the electrons are present.
The given statement is "The lowest energy configuration for an atom is the one having the maximum number of unpaired electrons allowed by the Pauli principle in a particular set of degenerate orbitals", which is same as the Hund's rule.
Thus, the given statement is Hund' rule.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that the momentum and position of an object can not be measured exactly at the same time.
So, the given statement <em>is not</em> Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
Aufbau principle tells about the filling of the electrons in subshells of an atom. Therefore, the given statement <em>is not </em>Aufbau principle.