Answer:
explanation of this effect is the photoelectric effect
Explanation:
Let's describe the process, when light of large wavelength falls, this implies a small energy, according to Planck's equation
E = h f =
the energy of the photons is not enough to carry out an electronic transition between two states of the material, when we decrease the wavelength (the energy of the photons increases), the point is reached where the energy of the beam is equal to some energy of a transition, by which the electrons are promoted and since we can see a certain charge, as the atoms are neutral, some electrons must be removed from the material, this is represented in the macroscopic case as the work function of the material, consequently a unbalanced load that is what we can measure.
When we increase the lightning intensity, what we do is that we increase the number of photons and if each photon can remove an electron, by removing the electrons the difference between it and the positive charge (fixed in the nuclei) increases.
We can analyze the interaction of the photon and the electron as a particular collision.
The explanation of this effect was made by Einstein in his explained of the photoelectric effect
Answer:
B. Metallic bonds are stronger than hydrogen bonds but weaker than ionic bonds.
Explanation:
a p e x , just took the quiz
Answer:
Part(a): the capacitance is 0.013 nF.
Part(b): the radius of the inner sphere is 3.1 cm.
Part(c): the electric field just outside the surface of inner sphere is
.
Explanation:
We know that if 'a' and 'b' are the inner and outer radii of the shell respectively, 'Q' is the total charge contains by the capacitor subjected to a potential difference of 'V' and '
' be the permittivity of free space, then the capacitance (C) of the spherical shell can be written as

Part(a):
Given, charge contained by the capacitor Q = 3.00 nC and potential to which it is subjected to is V = 230V.
So the capacitance (C) of the shell is

Part(b):
Given the inner radius of the outer shell b = 4.3 cm = 0.043 m. Therefore, from equation (1), rearranging the terms,

Part(c):
If we apply Gauss' law of electrostatics, then

Explanation:
<em>Hello</em><em> </em><em>there</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em>!</em>
<em>You</em><em> </em><em>just</em><em> </em><em>need</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>use</em><em> </em><em>simple</em><em> </em><em>formula</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>force</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>momentum</em><em>, </em>
<em>F</em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>m.a</em>
<em>and</em><em> </em><em>momentum</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>p</em><em>)</em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>m.v</em>
<em>where</em><em> </em><em>m</em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>mass</em>
<em>v</em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>velocity</em><em>.</em>
<em>a</em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>acceleration</em><em> </em><em>.</em>
<em>And</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>solutions</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>pictures</em><em>. </em>
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it helps</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>