1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vfiekz [6]
2 years ago
5

The intensity of a sound wave at a fixed distance from a speaker vibrating at 1.00 kHz is 0.750 W/m2. (a) Determine the intensit

y if the frequency is increased to 2.20 kHz while a constant displacement amplitude is maintained.(b) Calculate the intensity if the frequency is reduced to 0.250 kHz and the displacement amplitude is quadrupled.
Physics
1 answer:
sveticcg [70]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a)   I = 3.63 W / m² , b)   I = 0.750 W / m²

Explanation:

The intensity of a sound wave is given by the relation

         I = P / A = ½ ρ v (2π f s_{max})²

         I = (½ ρ v 4π² s_{max}²) f²

a) with the initial condition let's call the intensity Io

        cte = (½ ρ v 4π² s_{max}²)

         I₀ = cte s² f₀²

        I₀ = cte 10 6

If frequency is increase f = 2.20 10³ Hz

         I = constant (2.20 10³) 2

         I = cte 4.84 10⁶

let's find the relationship of the two quantities

        I / Io = 4.84

        I = 4.84 Io

        I = 4.84 0.750

        I = 3.63 W / m²

b) in this case the frequency is reduced to f = 0.250 10³ Hz and the displacement s = 4 s or

        I = cte (f s)²

        I = constant (0.250 10³ 4)²

 

        I = cte 1 10⁶

         

the relationship

        I / Io = 1

        I = Io

        I = 0.750 W / m²

You might be interested in
The US government wants to allocate billions of dollars in the next 10 years to help assure our future energy security. The fund
Tom [10]

This question is a very good one indeed! I am very happy you asked it. I would first like to say that, although energy is important, our planet is more so. That is why I feel like we should always try to explore ideas that are both useful to the human race but also useful in protecting our environment because what is the use in having energy if we will not be able to use it. That is why I feel that we should try at types of energy like solar and wind. The problem is finding ways that are less expensive and more efficient. For example, creating a wind energy system that creates a sizeable about of energy and also is not too expensive and hard to make like the wind turbines of nowadays. Also what comes into question is the effect of these ideas and I feel that although some of these may have harmful effects, they must be used. One thing though is that I do not agree in expanding on our oil and gas exploration because it has so many bad effects to our environment that it is hardly worth it. If we can find alternatives in these other sources, like many states in the USA are trying to do, then we will be able to move much faster in technology and also help protect our lovely planet.

7 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know what the answers are?
baherus [9]

Answer:

Option (C) is the answer

Explanation:

may be it is possible if that we stand so far

4 0
3 years ago
A stationary bomb explodes in space breaking into a number of small fragments. At the location of the explosion, the net force d
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

.D)The Vector sum of the linear momenta of the fragments must be zero.

Explanation:

.D)The Vector sum of the linear momenta of the fragments must be zero.

This statement is true. This is so because no external force is acting on the masses. The motion is created by internal force so momentum of fragments will be conserved.

A) this statement is false because kinetic energy was zero in the beginning ( the bomb was stationary in the beginning )

B ) This statement is false because it violates the law of conservation of momentum .( it does not violates only when all the fragments have equal mass )

C ) This statement is zero because kinetic energy is not a vector quantity so two kinetic energy when added can not sum up to zero.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did the acorn fall to earth instead of rising up to the moon?
Andrei [34K]
Because earths gravitational force is greater than that of the moon.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does a physicst answer a scientific question? (APEX)
mart [117]

B. by taking measurements during an experiment

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A 94.7 kg horizontal circular platform rotates freely with no friction about its center at an initial angular velocity of 1.75 r
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between parallel and series​
    15·1 answer
  • All waves must ____ have to travel through
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of acceleration? A a bicyclist turning around a corner B a car traveling south with its cruise cont
    15·1 answer
  • Which section (A or B) of the roller coaster shows positive acceleration?
    14·2 answers
  • Select all that apply.
    7·1 answer
  • A solid sphere of radius 40.0 cm has a total positive charge of 16.2 μC uniformly distributed throughout its volume. Calculate t
    7·1 answer
  • Pls help im begging you
    11·1 answer
  • A 8.0-g bullet with an initial velocity of 115.0 m/s lodges in a block of wood and comes to rest at a
    14·1 answer
  • What two energies does a bulldozer use​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!