I would say 4
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
This is an example of how an apprenticeship can benefit both the business owner and the apprentice.
Explanation:
Apprenticeship is the system or process of hiring someone to train him/her to learn the trade. This method is used in companies and other jobs to train new generations about the trade and also pass on the job.
David may have had the bicycle shop for three decades but now that he desired more free time, he had to pass on the work to someone who can take care of the shop in his place. The apprenticeship of Josie enabled him to have the desired free time while his shop still runs. This is an example of how apprenticeship is beneficial for both parties.
Answer:
Tariff
Explanation:
A Tariff is otherwise known as an import duties, it is the taxes imposed on goods that come from other countries into a particular country. Tariff is imposed for so many reasons one of which is to protect local industries of the country i.e enabling local industries in the country to have profitability in their business and eliminating competitions from foreign organisation.
By imposing tariff, the rate of goods imported into a country will be reduced and this will encourage local production of goods and discourage importation.
Answer:
Fraud Investigators Inc.
Date Particulars Debit Credit
31 Mar Accounts Receivable $ 17,000
Service Revenue $ 17000
On March 31, 10 customers were billed for detection services totaling $17,000
31 October Bad Debts $1100 Dr.
Allowance for Doubtful Debts $ 1100 Cr
When Allowance for Doubtful Debts is created .
<em>At the year end this adjusting entry would be passed . This is an adjusting entry and is not passed on 31st October. It is recorded on the year end.</em>
<em> Allowance for Doubtful Debts $ 1100 Dr.</em>
<em> Accounts Receivable $ 1100 Cr</em>
<em />
<em />
Dec 15 Allowance for Doubtful Debts $ 720 Dr
Bad Debts $ 720 Cr
Recovery Of Bad Debts
<em />
Dec 31 Bad debts $ 420 Dr
Allowance for Doubtful Debts $ 420 Cr
On December 31, $420 of bad debts were estimated and recorded for the year
To know which is more effective, let's just put a fictional number of 100 purchase to test it.
Option A: $2 per person, 60% purchase
Option B: $0.1 per person, 2% purchase
For Option A, cost would be $200 and ended up in 60 purchases
For option B, cost would be $10 and ended up in 2 purchases (if the cost is lifted into $ 200, the purchases is 2 x10 = 20)
Which means option A is more effective.