All categories

3 years ago

Would you expect to weigh more on an ocean beach or on top of a mountain? Explain.

Physics

1 answer:

frosja888 [35]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

An Ocean beach

Explanation:

a Ocean beach is far heavier than the top of a mountain, despite that a mountain is made with many heavy rocks a Ocean beach may have light sand but the layers of sand and the width would be way heavier then the top of a mountain.

You might be interested in

To do your homework correctly you should (5 points)

pychu [463]

Answer:

C according to me

Explanation:

ITS HARD

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. You place an object 63 cm in front of a converging lens, with a 40 cm focal length.

NikAS [45]

Answer:

109.6 cm , - 1.74 , real

1.5

Explanation:

d₀ = object distance = 63 cm

f = focal length of the lens = 40 cm

d = image distance = ?

using the lens equation

$\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{d_{o}} + \frac{1}{d}$

$\frac{1}{40} = \frac{1}{63} + \frac{1}{d}$

d = 109.6 cm

magnification is given as

$m = \frac{-d}{d_{o}}$

$m = \frac{-109.6}{63}$

m = - 1.74

The image is real

d₀ = object distance = a

d = image distance = - (a + 5)

f = focal length of lens = 30 cm

using the lens equation

$\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{d_{o}} + \frac{1}{d}$

$\frac{1}{30} = \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{- (a + 5)}$

a = 10

magnification is given as

$m = \frac{-d}{d_{o}}$

$m = \frac{- (- (a +5))}{a}$

$m = \frac{(5 + 10)}{10}$

m = 1.5

6 0

3 years ago

skater spins over a point at a speed of 3.0 rotations per second then the momentum of inertia is 0.60 kg.M2, what is its angular

laiz [17]

Answer:

$L=11.3\ kg-m^2/s$

Explanation:

Given that,

Angular speed of a skater, $\omega=3\ rot/s=18.84\ rad/s$

The moment of inertia of the skater, I = 0.6 kg-m²

We need to find the angular momentum of the skater. The formula for the angular momentum of the skater is given by :

$L=I\omega$

Substitute all the values,

$L=0.6\times 18.84\\\\L=11.3\ kg-m^2/s$

So, its angular momentum is equal to $11.3\ kg-m^2/s$ .

8 0

3 years ago

f your risk-aversion coefficient is A = 4 and you believe that the entire 1926–2015 period is representative of future expected

siniylev [52]

Answer:

The portfolio should invest 48.94% in equity while 51.05% in the T-bills.

Explanation:

As the complete question is not given here ,the table of data is missing which is as attached herewith.

From the maximized equation of the utility function it is evident that

$Weight=\frac{E_M-r_f}{A\sigma_M^2}$

For the equity, here as

$Weight$ is percentage of the equity which is to be calculated
${E_M-r_f}$ is the Risk premium whose value as seen from the attached data for the period 1926-2015 is 8.30%
$A$ is the risk aversion factor which is given as 4.
$\sigma_M$ is the standard deviation of the portfolio which from the data for the period 1926-2015 is 20.59