Answer: Speeding up the orbital speed of earth so it escapes the sun require the greater energy.
Explanation: To find the answer, we need to know more about the Orbital and escape velocities.
<h3>
What is Orbital and Escape velocity?</h3>
- Orbital velocity can be defined as the minimum velocity required to put the satellite in its orbit around the earth.
- The expression for orbital velocity near to the surface of earth will be,

- Escape velocity can be defined as the minimum velocity with which a body must be projected from the surface of earth, so that it escapes from the gravitational field of earth.
- The expression for orbital velocity will be,

- If we want to get into the sun, we want to slow down almost completely, so that your speed relative to the sun became almost zero.
- We need about twice the raw speed to go to the sun than to leave the sun.
Thus, we can conclude that, the speeding up the orbital speed of earth so it escapes the sun require the greater energy.
Learn more about orbital and escape velocity here:
brainly.com/question/28045208
#SPJ4
Yes. It's (speed squared)/(radius of the circle).
Answer:
The gravitational potential energy of the nickel at the top of the monument is 8.29 J.
Explanation:
We can find the gravitational potential energy using the following formula.

Identifying given information.
The nickel has a mass
, and it is a the top of Washington Monument.
The Washington Monument has a height of
, thus we need to find the equivalence in meters using unit conversion in order to find the gravitational potential energy.
Converting from feet to meters.
Using the conversion factor 1 m = 3.28 ft, we have

That give u s

Finding Gravitational Potential Energy.
We can replace the height and mass on the formula

And we get


The gravitational potential energy of the nickel at the top of the monument is 8.29 J.
Answer:
the unit of work is derived unit because joule is defined the work done by the force aftab 1 newton causing the displacement of one metre something newton metre(n-m) is also used to measuring work.
True, scientists often talk to each other to figure out if their results were similar and what they could have done better.
Although, talking to other scientists does have risks, other scientists could copy your work and further better it.
So, your final answer is TRUE, sorry for the long answer, I needed to have a word count about 20 characters and then I got carried away! lol