All categories

1 year ago

Which two parts of sedimentary rock formation include the breakdown and carrying away of existing rock?

Chemistry

2 answers:

mamaluj [8]1 year ago

7 0

Erosion and weathering

Rzqust [24]1 year ago

3 0

erosion and weathering.

erosion as in breaking it down, weathering is also a cause of erosion, but in the case of rain, it would carry away the remaining sediments.

You might be interested in

HELPPP MEEEEE!!!POR FAVOR

ikadub [295]

Answer:

Explanation:

hope it helps...

4 0

2 years ago

one reaction that produces hydrogen gas can be represented by the unbalanced chemical equation Mg(s)+HCI(aq) -> MgCI(aq)+H2(g

Sonbull [250]

<h3>Answer:</h3>

128 g HCl

<h3>General Formulas and Concepts:</h3>

<u>Pre-Algebra</u>

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Brackets
Parenthesis
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

Left to Right<u> </u>

<u>Chemistry</u>

<u>Atomic Structure</u>

Reading a Periodic Table

<u>Stoichiometry</u>

Reaction Mole Ratios
Using Dimensional Analysis

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

<u>Step 1: Define</u>

[RxN - Unbalanced] Mg (s) + HCl (aq) → MgCl (aq) + H₂ (g)

↓

[RxN - Balanced] 2Mg (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2MgCl (aq) + H₂ (g)

[Given] 3.25 mol Mg

[Solve] x g HCl

<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>

[RxN] 2 mol Mg → 2 mol HCl

[PT] Molar Mass of H - 1.01 g/mol

[PT] Molar Mass of Cl - 35.45 g/mol

Molar Mass of HCl - 1.01 + 35.45 = 36.46 g/mol

<u>Step 3: Stoich</u>

[S - DA] Set up: $\displaystyle 3.25 \ mol \ Mg(\frac{2 \ mol \ HCl}{2 \ mol \ Mg})(\frac{36.46 \ g \ HCl}{1 \ mol \ HCl})$
[S - DA] Multiply/Divide [Cancel out units]: $\displaystyle 127.61 \ g \ HCl$

<u>Step 4: Check</u>

<em>Follow sig fig rules and round. We are given 3 sig figs.</em>

127.61 g HCl ≈ 128 g HCl

3 0

1 year ago

What is the de Broglie wavelength, in cm, of a 11.0-g hummingbird flying at 1.20 x 10^2 mph?

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:1.123 x 10^-31cm

Explanation:

mass of humming bird= 11.0g

speed= 1.20x10^2mph

but I mile = 1.6m

1km=1000

I mile = 1.6x10^3m

1.20x10^2mph= 1.6x10^3m /1mile x at 1.20 x 10^2

=1.932 x10^5m

recall that

1 hr= 60 min

1 min=60 secs, 1hr=3600s

Speed = distance/ time

=1.932 x10^5 / 3600= 5.366 x 10 ^1 m/s

m= a 11.0g= 11.0 x 10^-3kg

h=6.626*10^-34 (kg*m^2)/s

Wavelength = h/mu

= 6.626*10^-34/(11 x 10^-3 x 5.366x 10^1)

6.63x10^-34/ 590.26x 10 ^-3= 1.123 x10^-33m

but 1m = 100cm

1.123 x 10 ^-33 x 100 = 1.123 x 10^-31cm

de broglie wavelength of humming bird = 1.123 x 10 ^-31cm

5 0

2 years ago

glucose 6‑phosphate+H2O⟶glucose+Pi glucose 6‑phosphate+H2O⟶glucose+Pi K′eq1=270 K′eq1=270 ATP+glucose⟶ADP+glucose 6‑phosphate AT

ddd [48]

Answer:

-30.7 kj/mol

Explanation:

The standard free energy for the given reaction that is the hydrolysis of ATP is calculated using the formula: ∆Go ’= -RTln K’eq

where,

R = -8.315 J / mo

T = 298 K

For reaction,

1. K′eq1=270,

∆Go ’= -RTln K’eq

= - 8.315 x 298 x ln 270

= - 8.315 x 298 x 5.59

= - 13,851.293 J / mo

= - 13.85 kj/mol

2. K′eq2=890

∆Go ’= -RTln K’eq

= - 8.315 x 298 x ln 890

= - 8.315 x 298 x 6.79

= - 16.82 kj/mol

therefore, total standard free energy

= - 13.85 + (-16.82)

= -30.7 kj/mol

Thus, -30.7 kj/mol is the correct answer.

6 0

2 years ago

Please help! If a forensic chemist discovers evidence through examination which would prove a person guilty of a crime, why then

Bogdan [553]

Explanation: You cannot be convicted of a crime without evidence. You cannot be convicted of a state crime. You cannot be convicted of a federal crime. If there is no evidence against you, under the law, it simply is not possible for the prosecutor's office to obtain a conviction at trial. So, when you do have evidence it is really impossible to not get convicted unless the judge truly believes your side of the story and declares you not guilty.

I hope this helped :) If not i'm sorry!

7 0

2 years ago