1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Radda [10]
3 years ago
10

Transform boundaries occur where two plates – a slide past each other. b slide apart from each other. c slide towards each other

. d do not move.
Chemistry
1 answer:
iogann1982 [59]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is A slide past eatchother
You might be interested in
Select the correct answer. When an atom in a reactant loses electrons, what happens to its oxidation number? A. Its oxidation nu
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

C. Its oxidation number increases.

Explanation:

  • <em><u>Oxidation is defined as the loss of electrons by an atom while reduction is the gain of electrons by an atom</u></em>.
  • Atoms of elements have an oxidation number of Zero in their elemental state.
  • When an atom looses electrons it undergoes oxidation and its oxidation number increases.
  • For example, <em><u>an atom of sodium (Na) at its elemental state has an oxidation number of 0. When the sodium atom looses an electrons it becomes a cation, Na+, with an oxidation number of +1 , the loss of electron shows an increase in oxidation number from 0 to +1.</u></em>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where are skeletal muscles used? Are they voluntary?
nadya68 [22]
The peripheral portion of the central nervous system (CNS) controls the skeletal muscles. Thus, these muscles are under conscious, or voluntary, control
3 0
3 years ago
A block has 73 kg is being pushed and accelerated at rate of 10 m/s. what force is being applied to the block?
ki77a [65]

Answer:

730 N

Explanation:

force =mass×acceleration

force= 73kg × 10 m/s

f=730N

8 0
2 years ago
Wht is the process of science cyclical and not a linear process??​
Dima020 [189]

Answer:The process of science is iterative.

Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.

Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …

4 0
3 years ago
Pls help!!! Write asap!! <br> How many moles of sulfur are there if you have 0.994g of sulfur
timama [110]

To convert weight to moles, we must use the molar weight found on the periodic table. Sulfur's (S) molar weight is 32.06 g/mol. Then we set up an equation and cancel out units:

\frac{1mole}{32.06g}*0.994g=0.031mol=3.1*10^{-2}mol

So now we know that 0.994g of sulfur is equal to 0.031 moles.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement concerning elements is true? (1) Different elements must have different numbers of isotopes. (2) Different eleme
    6·1 answer
  • What effect will there be on the accuracy of a measurement if you use a volumetric pipet that is not completely dry but instead
    8·1 answer
  • 2. What do you think would happen if you watered your houseplants with salt water?
    10·1 answer
  • What is melting point​
    12·2 answers
  • Identify the dominant intermolecular attraction in bh3.
    14·1 answer
  • In the movie, "Raiders of the Lost Ark", Indiana Jones takes a gold idol from a cave. The statue is resting on a table which is
    6·1 answer
  • What is true when a reaction reaches equilibrium? Select all that apply. *
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me with this quick!!
    9·2 answers
  • How many grams of ammonia are produced from 6 moles of nitrogen?
    10·1 answer
  • 2C8H18 (1) + 2502 (g) --&gt; 16CO2 (g) + 18H2O (g)
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!