Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Answer:
Gardner, identified as resident of the Springfield area, is charged with two counts of armed assault with intent to murder, assault and battery with a firearm, assault with a dangerous weapons, unlawful possession of a firearm, and discharging a firearm within 500 feet of a building.
Explanation:
yea
Answer:
(This is not the exact answer)
Explanation:
It's a system where everyone has fun. I love parties :D
Potlatch, ceremonial distribution of property and gifts to affirm or reaffirm social status, as uniquely institutionalized by the American Indians of the Northwest Pacific coast. The potlatch reached its most elaborate development among the southern Kwakiutl from 1849 to 1925. Although each group had its characteristic version, the potlatch had certain general features. Ceremonial formalities were observed in inviting guests, in speechmaking, and in the distribution of goods by the donor according to the social rank of the recipients. The size of the gatherings reflected the rank of the donor. Great feasts and generous hospitality accompanied the potlatch, and the efforts of the kin group of the host were exerted to maximize the generosity. The proceedings gave wide publicity to the social status of donor and recipients because there were many witnesses.
