1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
2 years ago
7

HELPPPPPPPPPP ME PLLSS LINK BELOW!!!

Chemistry
2 answers:
lidiya [134]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B hotplate beakers thermometers

Explanation:

____ [38]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:yea im going to go with A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Can someone help me I would really appreciate it
slega [8]
The condensed formula would be CH3-CH(CH4)-CH2-CH(CH4)-CH2-CH(CH4)-CH3. The molecular formula would be C10H25.
8 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP! Chemical reactions involving liquids only will be influenced by ALL of the following EXCEPT: a) temperature of the sy
Rom4ik [11]
<span>Chemical reactions involving only liquids will be influenced by ALL of the following EXCEPT: </span><span><span>c) size of reactant particles d) pressure of the system.

</span>Reason:
1) As per Arrhenius theory, rate of chemical reactions is influence by temperature. Mathematically it is expressed as: k = A exp(-Ea/RT)
</span>where, k = rate constant, A = collision frequency, Ea = activation energy, T = temp. From above relation, it can be seen that, chemical reactions involving only liquids will be influenced temperature.

2) Also, if know that, rates of chemical reactions is mathematically expressed as: Rate = [A]^{x} B^{y}....,
where A, B, .. are the reactants.
From above relation, it can be seen that, chemical reactions involving only liquids will be influenced concentration i.e. number of particle. 

3) However, since all the reactant and catalyst used (if any) is in liquid state, particle size of same  will not influence the reaction.

4) Also, since there are no gas-phase reactant, pressure will not affect the reaction. 
8 0
3 years ago
11 The cross section compares the densities of different Earth layers. Which Earth layer is most dense?
Naily [24]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

i took the quiz

8 0
2 years ago
How do the given animal reproduce ​
Aliun [14]

Answer:

Which animals????????

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Increased use of incineration is sometimes advocated as a safe way to dispose of chemical waste. But opponents of incineration p
pochemuha

Answer:

Option A is correct.

At the two incinerators at which leaks were reported, staff had had only cursory training on the proper procedures for incinerating chemical waste.

Explanation:

The main aim of the argument presented is to talk down the use of burning by incinerators method to dispose chemical waste. The argument presents great points in that there were 40 incidents at two existing commissioned incinerators in the last year where unexpected releases of dangerous chemical agents happened.

So, basically, the argument is all about how the high frequency of the unsuspected release of dangerous chemical agents should discourage this method of chemical waste disposal.

The argument then concluded that if more chemical waste are disposed using the burning by incinerator method, there will be more unsuspected release of dangerous chemicals.

We are then required to find the statement that most weakens the conclusion that there will be more toxic releases if more chemical waste are burned.

Analysing the Statements one by one

Statement A

This statement provides a possible reason for this high frequency of dangerous chemical releases. It states that the staff haven't been properly trained. So, this means that properly training the staff should most likely lead to lesser cases of toxic releases into the environment.

This is the statement that most weakens the conclusion.

Statement B

The conclusion wasn't about the incinerator method being the safest method. It was about whether increased incineration would lead to more toxic relaeses. So, this doesn't affect the conclusion.

Statement C

This statement says that incineration can be increased without building new incinerators by tapping into unused capacity at the old incinerators. Also doesn't affect rhe conclusion whether increased use of incineration will lead to more toxic leaks.

Statement D

This statement strengthens the argument; which is the opposite of what we're aiming to achieve.

Statement E

This statement hints that the toxic leaks do not have that much of a harmful effect because the toxic releases do not go beyond the property of the incinerator. This also doesnt tackle the conclusion about the frequency of leaks, it only addresses how not harmful the toxic leaks can be.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Complete and balance the following oxidation-reduction reactions, which give the highest possible oxidation state for the
    5·1 answer
  • If 15.60 g of a hydrated compound is heated in an oven for several hours, its mass drops to 8.63 g. Assuming that the reduction
    12·2 answers
  • Which type of bond results when one or more valence electrons are transferred from one atom to another?
    6·1 answer
  • Particles in a liquid move around just as freely as particles in a solid.
    10·2 answers
  • To change state from gas to a liquid
    7·1 answer
  • 7. The youngest part of the ocean floor is found ____.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the mass of water that results from combining 2.0 g of hydrogen with 16.0 g of oxygen?
    10·1 answer
  • Two students are having a tug of war. The flag on the rope begins at point Y. team A pulls to the left with force of 120 N. Team
    14·1 answer
  • 1:( Que estudia la química ?
    14·1 answer
  • How does the Law of Conservation of Matter apply to you when you eat food? Why do you not continuously gain exactly the amount o
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!