1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juli2301 [7.4K]
3 years ago
9

There is more than one answer

Physics
2 answers:
Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

the answers are the first 3.

Soloha48 [4]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

4.6

Explanation:

Ans is 4.6 b coz the difference b/w 4.6 and the other values is comparitively the largest.

You might be interested in
Three ideal polarizing filters are stacked, with the polarizing axis of the second and third filters at 21 degrees and 61 degree
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

1

When second polarizer is removed the intensity after it passes through the stack is    

                    I_f_3 = 27.57 W/cm^2

2 When third  polarizer is removed the intensity after it passes through the stack is    

                I_f_2 = 102.24 W/cm^2

Explanation:

  From the question we are told that

       The angle of the second polarizing to the first is  \theta_2 = 21^o  

        The angle of the third  polarizing to the first is     \theta_3 = 61^o

        The unpolarized light after it pass through the polarizing stack   I_u = 60 W/cm^2

Let the initial intensity of the beam of light before polarization be I_p

Generally when the unpolarized light passes through the first polarizing filter the intensity of light that emerges is mathematically evaluated as

                     I_1 = \frac{I_p}{2}

Now according to Malus’ law the  intensity of light that would emerge from the second polarizing filter is mathematically represented as

                    I_2 = I_1 cos^2 \theta_1

                       = \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_1

The intensity of light that will emerge from the third filter is mathematically represented as

                  I_3 = I_2 cos^2(\theta_2 - \theta_1 )

                          I_3= \frac{I_p}{2}(cos^2 \theta_1)[cos^2(\theta_2 - \theta_1)]

making I_p the subject of the formula

                  I_p = \frac{2L_3}{(cos^2 \theta [cos^2 (\theta_2 - \theta_1)])}

    Note that I_u = I_3 as I_3 is the last emerging intensity of light after it has pass through the polarizing stack

         Substituting values

                      I_p = \frac{2 * 60 }{(cos^2(21) [cos^2 (61-21)])}

                      I_p = \frac{2 * 60 }{(cos^2(21) [cos^2 (40)])}

                           =234.622W/cm^2

When the second    is removed the third polarizer becomes the second and final polarizer so the intensity of light would be mathematically evaluated as

                      I_f_3 = \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_2

I_f_3 is the intensity of the light emerging from the stack

                     

substituting values

                     I_f_3 = \frac{234.622}{2} * cos^2(61)

                       I_f_3 = 27.57 W/cm^2

  When the third polarizer is removed  the  second polarizer becomes the

the final polarizer and the intensity of light emerging from the stack would be  

                  I_f_2 = \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_1

I_f_2 is the intensity of the light emerging from the stack

Substituting values

                  I_f_2 =  \frac{234.622}{2} cos^2 (21)

                     I_f_2 = 102.24 W/cm^2

   

7 0
3 years ago
Explain how artists use monocular cues to depth perception described in the text to create an impression of three dimensions on
lana66690 [7]

Answer:

The relative size of an object serves as an important monocular cue for depth perception. It works like this: If two objects are roughly the same size, the object that looks the largest will be judged as being the closest to the observer. This applies to three-dimensional scenes as well as two-dimensional images.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The 25 kg wheel has a radius of gyration about its center O of kO = 300 mm. When the wheel is subjected to the couple moment, it
N76 [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

radius of gyration of wheel k then

k² = r²/2

r² = 2 k²

r = √2 k

= 1.414 x .3 m

r = .4242 m

Moment of inertia of wheel

= mass x radius of gyration ²

= 25 x .3 x .3

= 2.25 kg m²

Friction force acting on it ( sliding )

= μmg , μ being coefficient of kinetic friction

This friction force will create linear acceleration in forward direction

Acceleration produced

= μg

= .6 x 9.8

= 5.88 m / s ²

This will also rotate the wheel , angular acceleration being

linear acceleration / radius

= 5.88 /.4242

= 13.86 radian / s²

3 0
3 years ago
You measure its length as it passes. by how many millimeters do you determine the rod has contracted?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
It sounds like a special relativity question but I need more info for a total answer. But remember it's length in the lab frame is
L•sqrt(1-(v/c)^2) where L is the rest length, v is its velocity magnitude and c is the speed of light. Sqrt is the square root (I'm on a phone so I can't see the math equation editor)
4 0
4 years ago
Một mặt phẳng vô hạn tích điện đều, mật độ σ = 4.10-9 C/cm2, đặt thẳng đứng trong không khí. Một quả cầu nhỏ có khối lượng 8 g,
dusya [7]

Answer:

The angle is 18.3 degree.

Explanation:

A uniformly charged infinite plane, density σ = 4 x 10^-9 C/cm^2, is placed vertically in air. A small ball of mass 8 g, with charge q = 10^-8 C, hangs close to the plane, so that the string is initially parallel to the plane. Take g = 9.8m/s2. When in equilibrium, by what angle is the string hanging the ball to the plane?

surface charge density, σ = 4 x 10^-5 C/m^2

Charge, q = 10^-8 C

mass, m = 0.008 kg

Let the angle is A and the tension in the string is T.

The electric field due to a plane is

E =\frac{\varepsilon \sigma }{2\varepsilon o}\\\\E =\frac{4\times 10^{-5}}{2\times 8.85\times 10^{-12}}\\\\E = 2.26\times 10^6 V/m \\

Now equate the forces,

T sin A = q E.... (1)\\\\T cos A = m g ..... (2)\\\\divide (1) by (2)\\\\tan A = \frac{10^{-8}\times 2.6\times 10^6}{0.008\times 9.8}\\\\tan A = 0.33\\\\ A = 18.3 degree

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Usually the force of gravity on electrons is neglected. To see why, we can compare the force of the Earth’s gravity on an electr
    10·1 answer
  • A simple harmonic oscillator oscillates with frequency f when its amplitude is
    5·1 answer
  • Which property of an object is the result of gravity?
    7·2 answers
  • Solve this.
    8·1 answer
  • Aircraft sometimes acquire small static charges. Suppose a supersonic jet has a 0.650 µC charge and flies due west at a speed of
    8·1 answer
  • Two forces act on a 55-kg object. One force has magnitude 65 N directed 59° clockwise from the positive x-axis, and the other ha
    8·1 answer
  • A person with a mass of 15kg is walking uphill at a velocity of2m/s. What is the walker's momentum?
    8·1 answer
  • Pe cine trebuia să îi fac de la școală cu sfârșit de<br> groază​
    15·1 answer
  • 8. What kind of information do black hole detectors not provide?
    7·2 answers
  • Does hot air rise? Why?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!