Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

11

What is the benefit of using simple computational models in a spreadsheet application, like the one used in this course, to pred

ict mechanical energy and related values?
(1 point)

It is easy to calculate new scenarios.

It is easy to learn new concepts.

It is easy to compare different cases.

It is easy to detect calculation errors.

2 answers:

Ghella [55]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Option C would be the correct alternative.

Explanation:

An integrated programming program for arranging, evaluating, and saving analytical results seems to be a spreadsheet. Spreadsheets have been established as computerized analogs to worksheets for manual banking.
There are various variables in something like a theoretical model that describes the structure being analyzed. By changing the variables as well as sometimes throughout combination while evaluating the outcome, analysis is performed.

The other choices offered aren't relevant to the existing contract below in the description section.

olya-2409 [2.1K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A uniform electric field is directed parallel to the +y axis. If a positive test charge begins at the origin and moves upward al

lukranit [14]

Answer: option 1 : the electric potential will decrease with an increase in y

Explanation: The electric potential (V) is related to distance (in this case y) by the formulae below

V = kq/y

Where k = 1/4πε0

Where V = electric potential,

k = electric constant = 9×10^9,

y = distance of potential relative to a reference point, ε0 = permittivity of free space

q = magnitude of electronic charge = 1.609×10^-19 c

From the formulae, we can see that q and k are constants, only potential (V) and distance (y) are variables.

We have that

V = k/y

We see the potential(V) is inversely proportional to distance (y).

This implies that an increase in distance results to a decreasing potential and a decrease in distance results to an increase in potential.

This fact makes option 1 the correct answer

3 0

3 years ago

Moist air initially at 1258C, 4 bar, and 50% relative humidity is contained in a 2.5-m3 closed, rigid tank. The tank contents ar

brilliants [131]

Here is the missing part of the question

To Determine the heat transfer, in kJ if the final temperature in the tank is 110 deg C

Answer:

Explanation:

The image attached below shows the process on T - v diagram

<u>At State 1:</u>

The first step is to find the vapor pressure

$P_{v1} = \rho_1 P_g_1$

$= \phi_1 P_{x \ at \ 125^0C}$

= 0.5 × 232 kPa

= 116 kPa

The initial specific volume of the vapor is:

$P_{v_1} v_{v_1} = \dfrac{\overline R}{M_v}T_1$

$116 \times 10^3 \times v_{v_1} = \dfrac{8314}{18} \times (125 + 273)$

$116 \times 10^3 \times v_{v_1} = 183831.7778$

$v_{v_1} = 1.584 \ m^3/kg$

<u>At State 1:</u>

The next step is to determine the mass of water vapor pressure.

$m_{v1} = \dfrac{V}{v_{v1}}$

$= \dfrac{2.5}{1.584}$

= 1.578 kg

Using the ideal gas equation to estimate the mass of the dry air $m_a$ $P_{a1} V = m_a \dfrac{\overline R}{M_a}T_1$

$(P_1-P_{v1}) V = m_a \dfrac{\overline R}{M_a}T_1$

$(4-1.16) \times 10^5 \times 2.5 = m_a \dfrac{8314}{28.97}\times ( 125 + 273)$

$710000= m_a \times 114220.642$

$m_a = \dfrac{710000}{114220.642}$

$m_a = 6.216 \ kg$

For the specific volume $v_{v_1} = 1.584 \ m^3/kg$ , we get the identical value of saturation temperature

$T_{sat} = 100 + (110 -100) \bigg(\dfrac{1.584-1.673}{1.210 - 1.673}\bigg)$

$T_{sat} =101.92 ^0\ C$

Thus, at $T_{sat} =101.92 ^0\ C$ , condensation needs to begin.

However, since the exit temperature tends to be higher than the saturation temperature, then there will be an absence of condensation during the process.

Heat can now be determined by using the formula

Q = ΔU + W

Recall that: For a rigid tank, W = 0

Q = ΔU + 0

Q = ΔU

Q = U₂ - U₁

Also, the mass will remain constant given that there will not be any condensation during the process from state 1 and state 2.

<u>At State 1;</u>

The internal energy is calculated as:

$U_1 = (m_a u_a \ _{ at \ 125^0 C})+ ( m_{v1} u_v \ _{ at \ 125^0 C} )$

At $T_1$ = 125° C, we obtain the specific internal energy of air

SO;

$U_{a \ at \ 125 ^0C } = 278.93 + ( 286.16 -278.93) (\dfrac{398-390}{400-390} )$

$=278.93 + ( 7.23) (\dfrac{8}{10} )$

$= 284.714 \ kJ/kg\\$

At $T_1$ = 125° C, we obtain the specific internal energy of water vapor

$U_{v1 \ at \ 125^0C} = u_g = 2534.5 \ kJ/kg$

$U_1 = (m_a u_a \ at \ _{ 125 ^0C }) + ( m_{v1} u_v \ at \ _{125^0C} )$

= 6.216 × 284.714 + 1.578 × 2534.5

= 5768.716 kJ

<u>At State 2:</u>

The internal energy is calculated as:

$U_2 = (m_a u_a \ _{ at \ 110^0 C})+ ( m_{v1} u_v \ _{ at \ 110^0 C} )$

At temperature 110° C, we obtain the specific internal energy of air

SO;

$U_{a \ at \ 110^0C } = 271.69+ ( 278.93-271.69) (\dfrac{383-380}{390-380} )$

$271.69+ (7.24) (0.3)$

$= 273.862 \ kJ/kg\\$

At temperature 110° C, we obtain the specific internal energy of water vapor

$U_{v1 \ at \ 110^0C}= 2517.9 \ kJ/kg$

$U_2 = (m_a u_a \ at \ _{ 110 ^0C }) + ( m_{v1} u_v \ at \ _{110^0C} )$

= 6.216 × 273.862 + 1.578 × 2517.9

= 5675.57 kJ

Finally, the heat transfer during the process is

Q = U₂ - U₁

Q = (5675.57 - 5768.716 ) kJ

Q = -93.146 kJ

with the negative sign, this indicates that heat is lost from the system.

6 0

3 years ago

One property that makes electromagnetic waves differ from other types of waves is that they can

IgorC [24]

Electromagnectic Waves Travel In A Vacuum

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help and I don't mean to sound rude but, ONLY ANSWER IF YOUR GOING TO DO ALL 4 QUESTIONS

anzhelika [568]

Answer:

for first question is 2

for second question 1

for third question 2

for forth question 1

Explanation:

i hope i helped

6 0

3 years ago

The windowpanes are___________ a. opaque b. transparent c. absorbent .

kogti [31]

Answer:

The windowpanes are- transparent.

The color of the panes are due to the wavelengths of light that the glass- allows to pass through

Explanation:

Just answered the question.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers