1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
3 years ago
12

Make a claim about why scientists might have two ways for thinking about Earth's layers. Summarize evidence to support the claim

and explain your reasoning.
Chemistry
1 answer:
amid [387]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Direct evidence from rock samples and indirect evidence from seismic waves may account for why scientists have two ways of thinking about earth's layers

Explanation:

Scientists who study about the earth's structure and components called geologists have two main types of evidence to learn about Earth's interior namely

1. direct evidence from rock samples

2. indirect evidence from seismic waves

Direct evidence From Rock Samples

Scientists examine rocks from inside the Earth and these rocks give them clues about Earth’s structure. Some scientists have drilled holes as much as 12 kilometers into Earth and bring up samples of rock. From these samples, they can make inferences about conditions deep inside Earth, where these rocks formed. In addition, forces inside Earth sometimes blast rock to the surface from depths of more than 100 kilometers. These rocks from deep within the Earth provide more information about the interior.

Indirect evidence From Seismic Waves

Since scientist cannot look inside Earth, they have devised an indirect methods of observation by using seismic waves. When earthquakes occur, they produce seismic waves. Scientists record the seismic waves and study how they travel through Earth. The speed of seismic waves and the paths they take reveal the structure of the planet. Using data from seismic waves, scientists have learned that Earth’s interior is made up of several layers with each layer surrounding the layers beneath it.

You might be interested in
How much heat is needed to raise a 0.30 g piece of aluminum from 30.C to 150C? The specific heat of aluminum 0.900j/gC
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

hi

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
I NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!!!<br>Which half-reaction correctly describes an oxidation?
e-lub [12.9K]

<u>Answer</u>:-

I think it’s Na or Br.

4 0
3 years ago
How many covalent bonds are the in a molecule of cyclohexane?
TiliK225 [7]

Their are 18 covalent bonds in a molecule of cyclohexane

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer the four questions to figure out the four digit code
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

question 1 =c

question 2 =a

question 3 =d

question 4 =b

8 0
1 year ago
How<br>many mols are in 151 g of dinitrogen monoxide? ​
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

3.43 moles

Explanation:

To convert moles into grams you must take the number of grams and divide it by the atomic mass of the compound.

in this case, grams is 151 and N2O has an atomic mass of 44.013

so your equation would look like

151/44.013=3.430804535

your answer would be 3.43 moles

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The energy level necessary to enable a reaction to a cure is called the activation true or false
    14·1 answer
  • How to do stoichiometry?
    13·2 answers
  • Question 3 of 8
    11·2 answers
  • Match the element with its oxidation number (charge).
    15·1 answer
  • If the hydrogen ion concentration, [H+], in a solution is 2.65 x 10-2 M, what is [OH-]?
    10·2 answers
  • How many grams of H2 will react with 350 g of N2?
    7·1 answer
  • Mistry- Unit 5 Test 1 33 of 50
    11·1 answer
  • Consider a neutral atom with 52 electrons and 74 neutrons. The atomic number of the element is...
    12·1 answer
  • Concert 15 cm3 to liters
    12·1 answer
  • WILL AWARD BRAINLIEST! HELP ME OUT PLESSE! I NEED HELP WITH THIS!
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!