1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
3 years ago
12

Make a claim about why scientists might have two ways for thinking about Earth's layers. Summarize evidence to support the claim

and explain your reasoning.
Chemistry
1 answer:
amid [387]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Direct evidence from rock samples and indirect evidence from seismic waves may account for why scientists have two ways of thinking about earth's layers

Explanation:

Scientists who study about the earth's structure and components called geologists have two main types of evidence to learn about Earth's interior namely

1. direct evidence from rock samples

2. indirect evidence from seismic waves

Direct evidence From Rock Samples

Scientists examine rocks from inside the Earth and these rocks give them clues about Earth’s structure. Some scientists have drilled holes as much as 12 kilometers into Earth and bring up samples of rock. From these samples, they can make inferences about conditions deep inside Earth, where these rocks formed. In addition, forces inside Earth sometimes blast rock to the surface from depths of more than 100 kilometers. These rocks from deep within the Earth provide more information about the interior.

Indirect evidence From Seismic Waves

Since scientist cannot look inside Earth, they have devised an indirect methods of observation by using seismic waves. When earthquakes occur, they produce seismic waves. Scientists record the seismic waves and study how they travel through Earth. The speed of seismic waves and the paths they take reveal the structure of the planet. Using data from seismic waves, scientists have learned that Earth’s interior is made up of several layers with each layer surrounding the layers beneath it.

You might be interested in
ΔH is always positive for a ...........
scoray [572]

Answer:

a. endothermic reaction

Explanation:

In an endothermic reaction, heat is absorbed from the environment. This leaves the surrounding at a colder temperature compared to the system.

ΔH, the change in enthalpy is assigned a positive sign because the heat energy level of the final state is higher than that of the initial state.

Some examples are mostly dissolution substances in water.

8 0
3 years ago
How much heat is absorbed by 0.060 kg of copper when it is heated from 20.0°C to 80.0°C if the specific heat of copper is 385J/k
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

its 1386J

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Which characteristic of water allows its molecules to form hydrogen bonds?
JulijaS [17]
When water molecules align with each other, a weak bond is established between the negatively charged oxygen atom<span> of one water molecule and the positively charged </span>hydrogen atoms<span> of a neighboring water molecule. The weak bond that often forms between </span>hydrogen atoms<span> and neighboring atoms is the hydrogen bond.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a refrigerator is a heat pump that follows the first law of thermodynamics, how much heat was removed from food inside of the
kirill115 [55]
The first law of thermodynamics states the conservation of energy and heat where the <span>total energy in an isolated system may be transformed into another, but never created or destroyed. If 314 J of energy was released to the room, then also 314 J of energy was also removed from food in that refrigerator assuming it is an isolated system. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
A sample of an unknown compound was decomposed and found to be composed of 1.36 mol oxygen, 4.10 mol hydrogen, and 2.05 mol carb
AfilCa [17]

We are given the number of moles:

O = 1.36 mol

H = 4.10 mol

C = 2.05 mol

 

To get the empirical formula, first divide everything by the smallest number of moles = 1.36 mol. So that:

O = 1 mol

H = 3 mol

C = 1.5 mol

 

Next step is to multiply everything by a number such that all will be a whole number. In this case, multiply by 2 to get a whole number for C, so that:

O = 2 mol

H = 6 mol

C = 3 mol

 

Therefore the empirical formula of the compound is:

C3H6O2

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did soldiers use to rub mold on their wounds?
    14·1 answer
  • Determination of the acetic acid (ch3cooh) content of vinegar calculate the molarity of the diluted vinegar using data from one
    6·1 answer
  • If it requires 18.2 milliliters of 0.45 molar barium hydroxide to neutralize 38.5 milliliters of nitric acid, solve for the mola
    8·2 answers
  • Nacl is an ionic solid. the na+ and cl− ions in nacl are bonded through an electrostatic force of attraction commonly known as t
    8·1 answer
  • Question is chemistry:
    12·1 answer
  • Which layer is considered an intrusion?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following could be considered a benefit of modern farming
    9·2 answers
  • When is the mole ratio from a balanced chemical reaction not needed in a calculation
    8·1 answer
  • How are elliptical galaxies different from spiral galaxies?
    13·1 answer
  • Copper carbonate (CuCO3) reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCl) according to this equation:
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!