<span>Because of our perception of the universe from inside the universe, we are unable to see how and towards what the universe is expanding. Also, our understanding of it is further complicated because we are moving as part of the expansion, thus distorting our perception of it.</span>
Answer:
The acceleration of a point on the wheel is 11.43 m/s² acting radially inward.
Explanation:
The centripetal acceleration acts on a body when it is performing a circular motion.
Here, a point on the bicycle is performing circular motion as the rotation of the wheel produces a circular motion.
The centripetal acceleration of a point moving with a velocity
and at a distance of
from the axis of rotation is given as:
![a=\frac{v^2}{r}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a%3D%5Cfrac%7Bv%5E2%7D%7Br%7D)
Here, ![v=8\ m/s,r=0.70\ m](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=v%3D8%5C%20m%2Fs%2Cr%3D0.70%5C%20m)
∴ ![a=\frac{8}{0.70}=11.43\ m/s^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a%3D%5Cfrac%7B8%7D%7B0.70%7D%3D11.43%5C%20m%2Fs%5E2)
Therefore, the acceleration of a point on the wheel is 11.43 m/s² acting radially inward.
Answer:
The tension force in the supporting cables is 7245N
Explanation:
There are two forces acting on the elevator: the force of gravity pointing down (+) with magnitude (elevator mass) x (gravitational acceleration), and the tension force of the cable pointing up (-) with an unknown magnitude F. The net force is the sum of these forces:
![F_{net} = F_g - F = m\cdot g - F\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_%7Bnet%7D%20%3D%20F_g%20-%20F%20%3D%20m%5Ccdot%20g%20-%20F%5C%5C)
We are given the resulting acceleration along with the mass, i.e., we know the net force, allowing us to solve for F:
![1150kg\cdot 3.5\frac{m}{s^2}= 1150kg \cdot 9.8\frac{m}{s^2}-F\\\implies F = 1150kg\cdot(9.8-3.5)\frac{m}{s^2}= 7245N](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1150kg%5Ccdot%203.5%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%5E2%7D%3D%201150kg%20%5Ccdot%209.8%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%5E2%7D-F%5C%5C%5Cimplies%20F%20%3D%201150kg%5Ccdot%289.8-3.5%29%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%5E2%7D%3D%207245N)
The tension force F in the supporting cables is 7245N
Your answer would be A. You divide 96 by 16 to find the answer
Because it's literally impossible to tell exactly where something that size is
located at any particular time.
And that's NOT because it's so small that we can't see it. It's because any
material object behaves as if it's made of waves, and the smaller the object is,
the more the size of its waves get to be like the same size as the object.
When you get down to things the size of subatomic particles, it doesn't make
sense any more to try and talk about where the particle actually "is", and we only
talk about the waves that define it, and how the waves all combine to become a
cloud of <em><u>probability</u></em> of where the particle is.
I know it sounds weird. But that's the way it is. Sorry.