From the ones that you are showing me <span>the more positive the potential the more likely: </span>
<span>Fe+3 + e- ---> Fe+2
I hope this is something very useful</span>
<u>Answer:</u> The value of <em>i</em> is 1.4 and 40% dissociation of 100 particles of zinc sulfate will yield 60 undissociated particles.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The equation used to calculate the Vant' Hoff factor in dissociation follows:
where,
= degree of dissociation = 40% = 0.40
i = Vant' Hoff factor
n = number of ions dissociated = 2
Putting values in above equation, we get:
The equation used to calculate the degee of dissociation follows:
Total number of particles taken = 100
Degree of dissociation = 40% = 0.40
Putting values in above equation, we get:
This means that 40 particles are dissociated and 60 particles remain undissociated in the solution.
Hence, 40% dissociation of 100 particles of zinc sulfate will yield 60 undissociated particles.
Answer:
It Is Considered The "negative" Electrode
Explanation:
An electrochemical cell is an electrolytic cell that drives a non-spontaneous redox reaction through the application of electrical energy. This cell is used to decompose chemical compounds, in a process called electrolysis. An electrode at which reduction take place is called the cathode. In reduction, electrons travel toward the site of reduction such that the negative charge is on the cathode.
Answer:
Scientists seek to eliminate all forms of bias from their research. However, all scientists also make assumptions of a non-empirical nature about topics such as causality, determinism and reductionism when conducting research. Here, we argue that since these 'philosophical biases' cannot be avoided, they need to be debated critically by scientists and philosophers of science.
Explanation:
Scientists are keen to avoid bias of any kind because they threaten scientific ideals such as objectivity, transparency and rationality. The scientific community has made substantial efforts to detect, explicate and critically examine different types of biases (Sackett, 1979; Ioannidis, 2005; Ioannidis, 2018; Macleod et al., 2015). One example of this is the catalogue of all the biases that affect medical evidence compiled by the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University (catalogueofbias.org). Such awareness is commonly seen as a crucial step towards making science objective, transparent and free from bias.
