Answer:
atom is the answer I think
3.74×
3.74 ×
molecules of propane were in the erlenmeyer flask.
number of moles of propane can be calculated as moles of propane.
mass of propane = 0.274 g
molar mass of propane = 44.1
So this gives us the value of 6.21×
moles of propane
No one mole of propane As a 6.0-2 × 
so, 6.21 ×
× 6. 022 × 10^23
= 3.74 ×
Therefore, molecules of propane were in the erlenmeyer flask is found to be 3.74 ×
<h3>What is erlenmeyer flask?</h3>
- A laboratory flask with a flat bottom, a conical body, and a cylindrical neck is known as an Erlenmeyer flask, sometimes known as a conical flask or a titration flask.
- It bears the name Emil Erlenmeyer after the German chemist.
<h3>What purpose does an Erlenmeyer flask serve?</h3>
- Liquids are contained in Erlenmeyer flasks, which are also used for mixing, heating, chilling, incubating, filtering, storing, and other liquid-handling procedures.
- For titrations and boiling liquids, their sloped sides and small necks make it possible to whirl the contents without worrying about spills.
To learn more about calculating total molecules visit:
brainly.com/question/8933381
#SPJ4
Answer:
A combination is certainly possible, but you should not take formal charges so literally
Normally, when a covalent bond is found, the two atoms both bring in one electron. As you identify correctly, in the case of nitric acid that would not be possible completely. If you draw the different possible resonance structures, the most likely structure has a single bond between the nitrogen and an oxygen where the oxygen has 3 lone pairs and both electrons in the bond are donated by the nitrogen. This makes the nitrogen "positive" and that oxygen "negative", but in fact the electrons move more freely in the molecule and charges are more distributed. You will not be able to find "the negatively charged" oxygen atom.
Explanation:
<h2>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> </u><u>MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u><u> AND</u><u> FOLLOW</u><u> M</u><u> E</u><u> LOTS</u><u> OF</u><u> LOVE</u><u> FROM</u><u> MY</u><u> HEART</u><u> AND</u><u> SOUL</u><u> DARLING</u><u> </u><u>TEJASWI </u><u> HERE</u><u> ❤️</u></h2>
If you were to take water (like many other materials) and break it up into almost the smallest things you could, you’d get molecules. If the molecules are stuck together really tightly in a regular pattern, then they’re called a solid. The solid form of water is ice. This actually makes a lot of sense, because it certainly does seem like all the little parts of a solid (like ice) are stuck together very tightly.
When you heat something up, it makes the molecules move faster. If you heat up a typical solid, it melts and becomes a liquid. In a liquid (like water), the molecules are still stuck together, but they can move around some. What actually happens is that the molecules are still sort of sticking together, but they’re constantly breaking apart and sticking to different molecules. This also makes sense when you think about water. Water sort of sticks together, but it breaks apart /really/ easily.
If you heat a liquid like water up even more (like if you put it in a pot on the stove), then the molecules will move around so fast that they can’t even hold on to each other at all. When this happens, all of the molecules go flying apart and become a gas (like when you boil water to make steam). The process of gas molecules leaving the liquid to go into the gas is called "evaporation." The opposite process is called "condensation."
<span>Hope this answers your question!</span>
Explanation :
As we know that Mendeleev arranged the elements in horizontal rows and vertical columns of a table in order of their increasing relative atomic weights.
He placed the elements with similar nature in the same group.
According to the question, the atomic weight of iodine is less than the atomic weight of tellurium. So according to this, iodine should be placed before tellurium in Mendeleev's tables. But Mendeleev placed iodine after tellurium in his original periodic table.
However, iodine has similar chemical properties to chlorine and bromine. So, in order to make iodine queue up with chlorine and bromine in his periodic table, Mendeleev exchanged the positions of iodine and tellurium.
As we know that the positions of iodine and tellurium were reversed in Mendeleev's table because iodine has one naturally occurring isotope that is iodine-127 and tellurium isotopes are tellurium-128 and tellurium-130.
Due to high relative abundance of tellurium isotopes gives tellurium the greater relative atomic mass.