Complete question is;
Identify the type of reaction in the chemical reaction below:
2P205 ➡️ 4P + 502
single replacement
synthesis
decomposition
combustion
double replacement
Answer:
Decomposition
Explanation:
We. An see in the question that the compound 2P205 is broken down into simpler substances which are phosphorus (P) and oxygen (O).
Now, this is a decomposition reaction because a decomposition reaction is one in which a compound is broken down into simpler substances
Answer:
32.7
Explanation:
I just did it and got it right
<u>Answer:</u> The energy of one photon of the given light is 
<u>Explanation:</u>
To calculate the energy of one photon, we use Planck's equation, which is:
where,
= wavelength of light = 
(Conversion factor: 
)
h = Planck's constant = 
c = speed of light = 
Putting values in above equation, we get:
Hence, the energy of one photon of the given light is
Answer:
The answer to your question is letter D. 2.02 g
Explanation:
Data
moles of Ne = 0.100
atomic mass of Neon = 20.18 g
Process
1.- Use proportions to find the answer
20.18 g of Ne ------------------ 1 mol of Ne
x ------------------ 0.1 moles
x = (0.1 x 20.18)/1
x = 2.018
2.- Consider the significant figures
0.100 has three significant figures so the answer must be 2.02 g
This idea has historical significance. The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus (born 460 BCE), who held that everything is composed of small particles moving in empty space, is credited with developing the first hypothesis we have about the microscopic universe. He had some concrete proof for this, such the fact that items like a new loaf of bread or a rose may give off a scent even when they are far from the source. Being a materialist, he thought that these odors originated from actual material particles released by the bread or the rose, rather than being purely a type of magic. He reasoned that these particles must float through the air, with some of them maybe landing in your nose where you can smell them immediately. This still makes sense in modern times. But many of us now have quite different perspectives on these "particles."
Thank you,
Eddie
