Answer:
Superficial design improvements are typically only trivial changes to a design, while functional design improvements can change the way a product or process is used to significantly enhance performance.
Explanation:
As a PC board designer, I would sometimes spend a certain amount of time making traces have shorter routes, or fewer layer changes or bends. (I wanted to make the layout "pretty.") In some cases, these changes are superficial, affecting the appearance only. In some cases, they are functional, reducing crosstalk or emissions or susceptibility to interference.
I deal with a web site that seems to be changing all the time (Brainly). In many cases, the same information is rearranged on the page—a superficial change. In other cases, the information being displayed changes, or the way that certain information is accessed changes. These are functional changes. (Sometimes, they "enhance performance," and sometimes they don't, IMO.)
In short ...
<em>Superficial design improvements are typically only trivial changes to a design, while functional design improvements can change the way a product or process is used to significantly enhance performance.</em>
Answer:
In engineering and materials science, a stress–strain curve for a material gives the relationship between stress and strain. It is obtained by gradually applying load to a test coupon and measuring the deformation, from which the stress and strain can be determined (see tensile testing).
Explanation:
please mark brainliest
Answer:
b). Occurs at the outer surface of the shaft
Explanation:
We know from shear stress and torque relationship, we know that
where, T = torque
J = polar moment of inertia of shaft
τ = torsional shear stress
r = raduis of the shaft
Therefore from the above relation we see that
Thus torsional shear stress, τ is directly proportional to the radius,r of the shaft.
When r= 0, then τ = 0
and when r = R , τ is maximum
Thus, torsional shear stress is maximum at the outer surface of the shaft.
Answer: 12.4 feet
Explanation:
If there is a smooth transition and there is no change in slopes, energy considerations can be used
The cube has a kinetic energy of
ke = mv^2/2 = 10 lbm * 20^2ft^2/s^2 / 2 = 2000 lbm-ft^2 / s^2
At the highest point when there is a gain in potential energy
pe = mgh = 10 lbm * 32.2 ft/s^2 * h ft = 322 lbm ft^2/s^2
If there is no loss in energies,
pe = ke
322h lbm ft^2/s^2 = 2000 lbm ft^2/s^2
h = 2000 /322 = 6.211 (ft)
= h / sin(30) = 12.4 ft
Answer:
See attachment for detailed answer.
Explanation:
