Kepler did not study the speed of the planets, rather, he studied how the planets move in the solar system. He proposed three laws. As a summary, he described that the planets move around the sun in the shape of an ellipse (orbit), and the Sun being one of the foci. Then, he proposed the period for the planet to complete one revolution around the Sun.
On the other hand, Newton studied the forces acting on the planet (or any object in space) that explain how the planets move around the solar system as described by Kepler. Also, Kepler's observations only apply to planets and not the moons or satellites. Thus, Kepler only made laws from observations, while Newton based it from underlying principles that led him to mathematical equations such as the law of universal gravitation.
Given that <span>sample a has a higher melting point than sample
b. Therefore, sample a is a longer chain of a </span><span>fatlike solid substance. It could also be that the bonds present in sample a is much stronger which will require more energy to break. Hope this answers the question.</span>
Answer:
See Explanation
Explanation:
Hence the mass defect is;
[235.04393 + 1.00867] - [ 136.92532 + 96.91095 + 2(1.00867)]
= 236.0526 - 235.85361
= 0.19899 amu
Since 1 amu = 1.66 * 10^-27 Kg
0.19899 amu = 0.19899 * 1.66 * 10^-27 = 3.3 * 10^-28 Kg
Binding energy = Δmc^2
Binding energy = 3.3 * 10^-28 Kg * (3 * 10^8)^2 = 2.97 * 10^-11 J
ii) 
Hence the mass defect is;
[10.01294 + 1.00867] - [7.01600 + 4.00260]
= 11.02161 - 11.0186
= 0.00301 amu
Since 1 amu = 1.66 * 10^-27 Kg
0.00301 amu = 0.00301 * 1.66 * 10^-27 = 4.997 * 10^-30 Kg
Binding energy = Δmc^2
Binding energy = 4.997 * 10^-30 Kg * (3 * 10^8)^2 = 4.5 * 10^-13 J
The answer is A cause the water breaks down the rocks into small pieces which are called sediments. These things later on turn into rocks with pressure and heat
