Un compuesto químico se puede representar gráficamente por medio de una

If you have access to stock solutions of 1.00 M H3PO4, 1.00 M of HCl, and 1.00 M NaOH solution, (and distilled water of course),

garri49 [273]

Answer:

0.10L of 1.00M of H₃PO₄ and 0.1613L of 1.00M NaOH

Explanation:

The pKa's of phosphoric acid are:

H₃PO₄/H₂PO₄⁻ = 2.1

H₂PO₄⁻/HPO₄²⁻ = 7.2

HPO₄²⁻/PO₄³⁻ = 12.0

To make a buffer with pH 9.40 we need to convert all H₃PO₄ to H₂PO₄⁻ and an amount of H₂PO₄⁻ to HPO₄²⁻

To have a 50mM solution of phosphoures we need:

2L * (0.050mol / L) = 0.10 moles of H₃PO₄

0.10 mol * (1L / mol) = 0.10L of 1.00M of H3PO4

To convert the H₃PO₄ to H₂PO₄⁻ and to HPO₄²⁻ must be added NaOH, thus:

H₃PO₄ + NaOH → H₂PO₄⁻ + H₂O + Na⁺

H₂PO₄⁻ + NaOH → HPO₄²⁻ + H₂O + Na⁺

Using H-H equation we can find the amount of NaOH added:

pH = pKa + log [A⁻] / [HA] (1)

Where [A-] is conjugate base, HPO₄²⁻ and [HA] is weak acid, H₂PO₄⁻

pH = 7.40

pKa = 7.20

[A-] + [HA] = 0.10moles (2)

Replacing (2) in (1):

7.40 = 7.20 + log 0.10mol - [HA] / [HA]

0.2 = log 0.10mol - [HA] / [HA]

1.5849 = 0.10mol - [HA] / [HA]

1.5849 [HA] = 0.10mol - [HA]

2.5849[HA] = 0.10mol

[HA] = 0.0387 moles = H₂PO₄⁻ moles

That means moles of HPO₄²⁻ are 0.10mol - 0.0387moles = 0.0613 moles

The moles of NaOH needed to convert all H₃PO₄ in H₂PO₄⁻ are 0.10 moles

And moles needed to obtain 0.0613 moles of HPO₄²⁻ are 0.0613 moles

Total moles of NaOH are 0.1613moles * (1L / 1mol) = 0.1613L of 1.00M NaOH

Then, you need to dilute both solutions to 2.00L with distilled water.

4 0

3 years ago

How many non-bonding electrons does phosphorus have?

Eddi Din [679]

10 non-bonding electrons

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many moles are in 109 grams of kf

lions [1.4K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Molar mass of KF= 39 + 19= 58g/mol

Mass of KF = 109g

Amount = mass/molar mass

Amount = 109/58

Amount = 1.9moles

4 0

3 years ago

Name a possible product of this reaction in the presence of ether and AlCl3: methylbenzene + 1-chlorodecane.a. 1-methyl-2-decylb

Vikki [24]

Answer:

None of these

Explanation:

Friedel–Craft reaction is a reaction involves the attachment of substituents to the benzene ring.

Mechanism of the reaction of methylbenzene with 1-chlorodecane in the presence of ether and aluminum chloride :

Step -1 : Generation of stable carbocation.

Aluminium chloride acts as Lewis acid which removes the chloride ion from the alkyl halide forming carbocation. The primary carbocation thus formed gets rearranged to secondary primary carbocation which is more stable due to hyperconjugation.

Step-2: Attack of the ring to the carbocation

The pi electrons of the ring behave as a nucleophile and attacks the carbocation. Since, the group attached on the benzene is methyl (+R effect) , the attack is from the ortho and the para positions. Para product is more stable due to less steric hinderance.

The product formed is shown in mechanism does not mention in any of the options.

So, None of these is the answer