Answer:
Heat energy does not cool. Objects cool. Energy is not an object. Now, what happens when an object cools is that it gives off some of its thermal energy by one or more mechanisms: radiation, conduction, or convection. In radiation the energy escaped the object as electromagnetic waves - you see the red hot poker slowly dim as it cools, in conduction the energy is transferred Mechanically by the atoms of the hot object being in physical contact with those of the cool object and in convection the hot material moves to a cooler region where it gives up its heat energy by either radiation or conduction.
Answer:
The magnitude and direction of the resultant force are approximately 599.923 newtons and 36.405°.
Explanation:
First, we must calculate the resultant force (
), in newtons, by vectorial sum:
![\vec F = [(-200\,N)\cdot \cos 60^{\circ}+(400\,N)\cdot \cos 45^{\circ}+300\,N]\,\hat{i} + [(200\,N)\cdot \sin 60^{\circ} + (400\,N)\cdot \sin 45^{\circ}-100\,N]\,\hat{j}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%20F%20%3D%20%5B%28-200%5C%2CN%29%5Ccdot%20%5Ccos%2060%5E%7B%5Ccirc%7D%2B%28400%5C%2CN%29%5Ccdot%20%5Ccos%2045%5E%7B%5Ccirc%7D%2B300%5C%2CN%5D%5C%2C%5Chat%7Bi%7D%20%2B%20%5B%28200%5C%2CN%29%5Ccdot%20%5Csin%2060%5E%7B%5Ccirc%7D%20%2B%20%28400%5C%2CN%29%5Ccdot%20%5Csin%2045%5E%7B%5Ccirc%7D-100%5C%2CN%5D%5C%2C%5Chat%7Bj%7D)
(1)
Second, we calculate the magnitude of the resultant force by Pythagorean Theorem:
Let suppose that direction of the resultant force is an standard angle. According to (1), the resultant force is set in the first quadrant:
Where 
is the direction of the resultant force, in sexagesimal degrees.
The magnitude and direction of the resultant force are approximately 599.923 newtons and 36.405°.
If you multiply m (the unit for wavelength) with 1s (the unit for frequency), you will get m/s, the unit for speed. Now multiply! 25 m/s is your final answer!
The "D) People perceive objects as a whole" statement best describes an abductive reasoning. The abductive reasoning often has incomplete information as the base of its reasoning and the conclusion for this type of reasoning is not absolute. There will always be additional pieces of evidence and factors that could change the conclusion of this reasoning. Therefore<span> D statement is the most suitable answer.</span>
