Answer:
Explanation: Does any of this look right? To be honest I just looked it up.
Correct option:
The correct name for 
is diphosphorus pentoxide.
Why is called diphosphorus pentoxide?
is commonly known as diphosphorus pentoxide.
Phosphorus pentoxide has an intriguing property in that is actually its empirical formula, whereas 
is its actual molecular formula.
However, the name of the chemical was obtained from its empirical formula rather than from its molecular formula. The official name for this substance is diphosphorus pentoxide.
Oxygen-containing binary compounds have "oxide" as their "last name." Phosphorus is the "first name."
We list each atom's numbers below:
The di- and Penta- prefixes are used to indicate the presence of two and five oxygen atoms, respectively, in the molecule.
Learn more about diphosphorus pentoxide here,
brainly.com/question/18237346
#SPJ4
To know this you pretty much do have to kind of memorize a few electronegativities. I don't recall ever getting a table of electronegativities on an exam.
From the structure, you have:
I remember the following electronegativities most because they are fairly patterned:
EN
H
=
2.1
EN
C
=
2.5
EN
N
=
3.0
EN
O
=
3.5
EN
F
=
4.0
EN
Cl
=
3.5
Notice how carbon through fluorine go in increments of
~
0.5
. I believe Pauling made it that way when he determined electronegativities in the '30s.
Δ
EN
C
−
Cl
=
1.0
Δ
EN
C
−
H
=
0.4
Δ
EN
C
−
C
=
0.0
Δ
EN
C
−
O
=
1.0
Δ
EN
O
−
H
=
1.4
So naturally, with the greatest electronegativity difference of
4.0
−
2.5
=
1.5
, the
C
−
F
bond is most polar, i.e. that bond's electron distribution is the most drawn towards the more electronegative compound as compared to the rest.
When the electron distribution is polarized and drawn towards a more electronegative atom, the less electronegative atom has to move inwards because its nucleus was previously favorably attracted to the electrons from the other atom.
That means generally, the greater the electronegativity difference between two atoms is, the shorter you can expect the bond to be, insofar as the electronegative atom is the same size as another comparable electronegative atom.
However, examining actual data, we would see that on average, in conditions without other bond polarizations occuring:
r
C
−
Cl
≈
177 pm
r
C
−
C
≈
154 pm
r
C
−
O
≈
143 pm
r
C
−
F
≈
135 pm
r
C
−
H
≈
109 pm
r
O
−
H
≈
96 pm
So it is not necessarily the least electronegativity difference that gives the longest bond.
Therefore, you cannot simply consider electronegativity. Examining the radii of the atoms, you should notice that chlorine is the biggest atom in the compound.
r
Cl
≈
79 pm
r
C
≈
70 pm
r
H
≈
53 pm
r
O
≈
60 pm
So assuming the answer is truly
C
−
C
, what would have to hold true is that:
The
C
−
F
bond polarization makes the carbon more electropositive (which is true).
The now more electropositive carbon wishes to attract bonding pairs from chlorine closer, thereby shortening the
C
−
Cl
bond, and potentially the
C
−
H
bond (which is probably true).
The shortening of the
C
−
Cl
bond is somehow enough to be shorter than the
C
−
C
bond (this is debatable).
Answer:
ΔU = −55.45 kJ
Explanation:
From first law of thermodynamics in chemistry, we have;
ΔU = Q + W
where;
ΔU is change in internal energy
Q is the net heat transfer
W is the net work done
We are given;
Q = 74.6 kJ
But Q will be negative since heat is released
Thus;
ΔU = -74.6 kJ + W
We are given;
Constant pressure; P = 35 atm = 35 × 101325 = 3546375 N/m²
Volume before reaction; Vi = 8.2 L = 0.0082 m³
Volume after reaction; V_f = 2.8 L = 0.0028 m³
Now,
W = -P(V_f - V_i)
W = - 3546375(0.0028 - 0.0082)
W = 19.15 KJ
Thus;
ΔU = Q + W
ΔU = -74.6 kJ + 19.15 KJ =
ΔU = −55.45 kJ
The answer to this question would be: 3.125%
Half-life is the time needed for a radioactive molecule to decay half of its mass. In this case, the strontium-89 is already gone past 5 half lives. Then, the percentage of the mass left after 5 half-lives should be:
100%*(1/2^5)= 100%/32=3..125%
